冠心病介入治疗患者延续性护理干预对感染预防的效果分析

Effect of the continuing nursing intervention to infection prevention in patients with coronary heart disease and interventional therapy

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨冠心病合并感染患者介入治疗后实施延续性护理后预防效果,进一步为患者出院后延续护理提供理论指导依据。方法 选取2013年12月-2014年11月于医院进行介入治疗的冠心病患者106例为研究对象,随机分成对照组和观察组,对照组53例,给予常规护理;观察组53例,给予延续性护理;比较两组患者的生活质量评分和控制后感染率,数据采用SPSS 16.0软件进行统计分析。结果 观察组患者发生感染1例,感染率为1.89%,对照组患者发生感染13例,感染率为24.53%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05) ;患者介入治疗出院后 3、6、12个月的生活质量评分比较,观察组生活质量评分和KPS评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 冠心病患者实施介入治疗后给予延续护理,能明显提高患者的生活质量和生活自理能力,减少患者感染率及再次住院的次数,值得临床推广使用。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To investigate the preventive effect of continuing nursing to patients with coronary heart disease and infection, received interventional treatment, so as to further provide theoretical guidance and basis for the post-discharge continuing nursing. METHODS A total of 100 cases of patients with coronary heart disease after interventional treatment in the hospital from Dec. 2013 to Nov. 2014 were selected for this study, who were randomly divided into control group and observation group. The 53 patients in the control group received routine care, and 53 cases in the observation group were given continuing nursing. The quality of life score and infection rate after control were compared and SPSS 16.0 was used for statistic analysis. RESULTS There was one case got infection in observation group, with infection rate of 1.89%, and 13 cases in control group (24.53%). The data differences in two groups were significant (P<0.05). In the comparison of 3, 6 and 12 months after interventional treatment quality of life scores, quality of life score and KPS score in observation group were both higher than those in control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION After the interventional treatment to patients with coronary heart disease, continuing nursing can significantly improve the quality of life and self-care ability of patients, reduce the infection rate and chances of patients hospitalized again, worthy of clinical use.

     

/

返回文章
返回