老年重症感染性休克患者PICCO监测仪应用的研究

Application of PICCO detector in elderly patients with severe septic shock

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨感染性休克患者输血治疗的有效性,为感染性休克的治疗提供参考依据。方法 选取2010年1月-2015年6月住院治疗的感染性休克患者60例,随机分为输血组与未输血组各30例,给予治疗原发病、纠正酸中毒及电解质紊乱、抗感染、利尿、强心等基础治疗,输血组同时输注全血200~400 ml; 记录患者复苏24 h时液体总量、每小时尿量、中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI),复苏前及复苏3 d时患者血清降钙素原(PCT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平变化,肺水肿发生率及28 d内病死率。结果 两组复苏24 h时每小时尿量、CVP、MAP、GEDVI均较复苏前明显改善(P<0.05),输血组复苏24 h时液体总量少于未输血组(P<0.05),每小时尿量多于未输血组(66.08±54.83)ml(P<0.05); 两组复苏3 d时血清PCT、CRP均较复苏前明显下降(P<0.05),输血组复苏3 d时血清PCT、CRP低于未输血组; 输血组与未输血组肺水肿发生率分别为6.67%、13.33%,比较差异无统计学意义,28 d内病死率输血组为0,未输血组为16.67%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 感染性休克患者在常规液体复苏基础上适当进行输血治疗,可减少输液总量,增强机体抗炎症反应能力,有利于降低病死率。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the effectiveness of blood transfusion in treatment of patients with septic shock so as to provide guidance for treatment of the patients with septic shock. METHODS A total of 60 patients with septic shock who were hospitalized for treatment from Jan 2010 to Jun 2015 were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into the blood transfusion group and the non-blood transfusion group, with 30 cases in each.The enrolled patients were given the basic treatments, including the treatment of primary diseases, correction of acidosis and electrolyte disorder, anti-infection, diuresis, and cardiac foundation treatment; the blood transfusion group was treated with transfusion of whole blood for 200-400 ml at the same time.The total volume of fluids, urine output per hour, central venous pressure (CAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and ventricular end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) were recorded after the recovery for 24 hours; the changes of the levels of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were observed before the recovery and after the recovery for 3 days, and the incidence of pulmonary edema and mortality rate in 28 days were analyzed. RESULTS The urine output per hour, CVP, MAP, and EDVI of the two groups were improved more significantly after the recovery for 24 hours than before the recovery (P<0.05); the total volume of fluids of the blood transfusion group was less than that of the non-blood transfusion group after the recovery for 24 hours (P<0.05); the urine output per hour of the blood transfusion group was more than that of the non-blood transfusion group (66.08±54.83)ml(P<0.05).The levels of serum PCT and CRP of the two groups declined more remarkably after the recovery for 3 days than before the recovery (P<0.05); the levels of serum PCT and CRP of the blood transfusion group were lower than those of the non-blood transfusion group after the recovery for 3 days.The incidence rate of pulmonary edema was 6.67% in the blood transfusion group, 13.33% in the non-blood transfusion group, and there was no significant difference.The mortality rate in 28 days was 0 in the blood transfusion group, 16.67% in the non-blood transfusion group, and there was significant difference (P<0.05). CONCLUSION The patients with septic shock can be treated with appropriate blood transfusion on the basis of conventional fluid recovery, which may reduce the total volume of transfusion, enhance the body' s capability to resist inflammations, and reduce the mortality rate.

     

/

返回文章
返回