连续性肾替代与自动腹膜透析治疗心脏术后急性肾损伤发生感染的特征比较

Comparison of infection characteristics of continuous renal replacement therapy with automated peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery

  • 摘要: 目的 比较连续性肾替代疗法(CRRT)与自动腹膜透析(APD)治疗心脏术后急性肾损伤(AKI)后发生感染的临床特点,为AKI的替代治疗合并感染治疗提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2013年3月-2016年3月128例实施心脏术后继发AKI患者的临床资料,根据透析治疗方式分为CRRT组58例,APD组70例,记录两组治疗后感染率,分析感染特点。结果 CRRT组感染率为17.24%,检出标本以血液净化临时导管穿刺口分泌物为主占40.00%;APD组感染率为18.27%,检出标本以透出液为主占38.46%,两组感染率比较差异无统计学意义;CRRT组检出42株病原菌,革兰阳性球菌占59.52%,革兰阴性杆菌占33.33%,真菌占7.14%;APD组检出55株病原菌,革兰阳性球菌占65.45%,革兰阴性菌占30.91%,真菌占3.64%;革兰阳性球菌对万古霉素、利奈唑胺敏感率达100.00%,对头孢唑林、氨苄西林等耐药性较高;革兰阴性杆菌对亚胺培南、美罗培南敏感率达100.00%,对头孢曲松钠、左氧氟沙星、氨苄西林等耐药性较高;CRRT组万古霉素、替考拉宁、美罗培南、亚胺培南等用药剂量均高于APD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CRRT与APD治疗AKI感染率相当,CRRT以导管口感染为主,而APD以腹腔感染为主,CRRT对敏感抗菌药物用药剂量影响较大,临床应注意调整。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare infection characteristics of CRRT with APD in the treatment of AKI after cardiac surgery, so as to provide a references for anti-infective treatment of AKI. METHODS The clinical data of 128 patients with AKI after cardiac surgery from Mar. 2013 to Mar. 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, and were divided into CRRT group(58 cases) and APD group (70 cases) according to treatment methods. The infection rates of the two groups were recorded, and the infection characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS The infection rate of CRRT group was 16.46%, and the main detected specimen was incision secretions(36.73%). The infection rate of APD group was 18.14%, and the main detected specimen was dialysate(36.59%). The difference of infection rate was not significant between the two groups. Totally 42 pathogens were detected from CRRT group, including gram-positive bacteria(59.52%),gram-negative bacteria (33.33%),and fungi(7.14%), and 55 pathogens were detected from APD group, including gram-positive bacteria (65.45%),gram-negative bacteria (30.90%),and fungi(3.64%). The gram-positive bacteria had the sensitive rates of 100.00% to vancomycin and linezolid, and had high drug resistance to cefazolin and ampicillin. Gram-negative bacteria had the sensitive rates of 100.00% to imipenem and meropenem,and had high drug resistance to ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, and ampicillin. The dosages of vancomycin, teicoplanin, meropenem, and imipenem used in CRRT group were all more than those in APD goup, and the difference was significant(P<0.05). CONCLUSION The infection rates of CRRT and APD in the treatment of AKI were considerable, and CRRT group is mainly the incision infection, and APD group is mainly the abdominal infection. CRRT has a greater impact on the dosage of sensitive antibiotics, and should be attention to adjust in clinic.

     

/

返回文章
返回