平均动脉压维持水平对感染性休克患者肾功能及肾血流指标的影响研究

Impact of maintenance of mean arterial pressure on the renal function and renal blood flow indexes of patients with infectious shock

  • 摘要: 目的 研究平均动脉压维持水平对重症监护病房感染性休克患者肾功能及肾血流指标的影响,以了解平均动脉压维持水平的干预价值。方法 选取2014年3月-2016年6月医院重症监护病房收治75例感染性休克患者为观察组,同时期75名健康者为对照组,检测与比较两组受试者的肾功能指标及肾血流指标,并观察组中不同平均动脉压维持水平下,患者肾功能指标及肾血流指标。结果 观察组肾功能指标血清肌酐(Scr)、血清胱抑素C(CysC)及血尿素氮(BUN)水平分别为(240.53±25.57)μmol/L、(2.41±0.37)mg/L及(35.36±3.17)mg/dl,均高于对照组(198.25±17.25)μmol/L、(1.57±0.20)mg/L及(23.23±2.60)mg/dl,观察组肾主动脉和肾叶间动脉Vm、Vd及PI分别为(40.23±3.84)cm/s、(18.45±2.24)cm/s、(1.38±0.17)及(17.67±1.80)cm/s、(10.61±1.52)cm/s、(1.25±0.16),均差于对照组(50.87±4.66)cm/s、(25.20±2.63)cm/s、(1.05±0.11)及(14.24±1.81)cm/s、(25.26±2.63)cm/s、(0.85±0.11),且观察组中平均动脉压较低者的肾功能指标及肾血流指标均差于平均动脉压较高者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 平均动脉压维持水平对重症监护病房感染性休克患者肾功能及肾血流指标的影响较大,应重视对该类患者平均动脉压的调节与改善。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To study the impact of maintenance of mean arterial pressure on the renal function and renal blood flow indexes of patients with infectious shock in ICU,so as to understand the intervention significance of maintaining mean arterial pressure. METHODS A total of 75 patients with infectious shock in ICU of our hospital from Mar. 2014 to Jun. 2016 were selected as observation group,another 75 healthy persons at the same time were selected as control group,then the renal function and renal blood flow indexes of the two groups were detected and compared,and the renal function and renal blood flow indexes of observation group with different level of maintenance mean arterial pressure were compared too. RESULTS The renal function indexes including Scr,CysC and BUN of observation group were respectively (240.53±25.57)μmol/L,(2.41±0.37)mg/L and(35.36±3.17)mg/dl,which were all higher than (198.25±17.25)μmol/L,(1.57±0.20)mg/L and(23.23±2.60)mg/dl of control group,the renal main artery and interlobar artery Vm,Vd and PI of observation group were respectively (40.23±3.84)cm/s,(18.45±2.24)cm/s,(1.38±0.17) and(17.67±1.80)cm/s,(10.61±1.52)cm/s,(1.25±0.16),which were all lower than the(50.87±4.66)cm/s,(25.20±2.63)cm/s,(1.05±0.11)and(14.24±1.81)cm/s,(25.26±2.63)cm/s,(0.85±0.11)of control group, and the renal blood flow indexes of observation group with higher mean arterial pressure were all worse than those of patients with lower mean arterial pressure,and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION The impact of maintaining mean arterial pressure on the renal function and renal blood flow indexes of patients with infectious shock in ICU is great,so the mean arterial pressure regulation and improvement of these patients should be paid more attention.

     

/

返回文章
返回