肺结核患者胸部手术后不同镇痛方式对术后感染的影响

Influence of different analgesia methods on postoperative infections in pulmonary tuberculosis patients undergoing chest surgery

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨肺结核患者胸部手术后不同镇痛方式对术后感染的影响,为临床用药提供依据。方法 选取2012年12月- 2016年5月绍兴市立医院行手术治疗的肺结核患者320例,分别行胸腔镜下肺部分切除术、肺大泡切除术及脓胸切除术,所有患者采用常规硬膜外导管置入后全身麻醉,根据术后镇痛方式不同分为静脉镇痛组及硬膜外镇痛组,每组各160例; 观察两组患者医院感染率及医院感染部位分布,行体液培养及病原学分析; 采用荧光免疫流式细胞术,分别测定两组患者术前及镇痛后2 d的T淋巴细胞亚群(CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+)的数量。结果 320例患者中发生医院感染64例,感染率为20.00%; 两组患者主要感染部位为呼吸道、胃肠道、尿道、切口; 共分离出病原菌64株,其中静脉镇痛组检出病原菌40株,革兰阴性菌、革兰阳性菌、真菌分别占72.50%、25.00%和2.50%; 硬膜外镇痛组检出病原菌24株,革兰阴性菌、革兰阳性菌、真菌分别占66.66%、29.17%和4.17%; 镇痛2 d后,两组患者CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+均有所降低,其中静脉镇痛组CD4+、CD8+,硬膜外镇痛组CD4+与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),静脉镇痛组CD4+/CD8+,硬膜外镇痛组CD8+、CD4+/CD8+较术前出现下降,但差异无统计学意义。结论 硬膜外镇痛组患者术后感染率低于静脉镇痛组患者,两组患者感染类型及病原学构成相似,镇痛2 d后T淋巴细胞亚群均有所改变,但硬膜外镇痛组波动更小,其是否与术后感染相关还需进一步研究。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the influence of different analgesia methods on postoperative infections in pulmonary tuberculosis patients undergoing chest surgery so as to provide guidance for clinical use of antibiotics.METHODS A total of 320 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who received surgical procedures in Shaoxing Municipal Hospital from Dec 2012 to May 2016 were enrolled in the study, the patients received thoracoscopic partial lung resection, pulmonary bulb resection, and empyema resection, respectively, all of the patients were treated with general anesthesia after conventional epidural catheterization.The enrolled patients were divided into the intravenous analgesia group and the epidural analgesia group according to the method of postoperative analgesia, with 160 cases in each group.The incidence of nosocomial infections and distribution of nosocomial infection sites of the two groups of patients were observed, the culture of body fluid was carried out, the etiological analysis was performed, and the T lymphocyte subsets (CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) counts of the two groups of patients were determined before the surgeries and after the analgesia for 2 days.RESULTS Of the 320 patients, 64 had nosocomial infections, with the infection rate 20.00%.The respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, and incision were the major infection sites of the two groups of patients.Totally 64 strains of pathogens were isolated, of which 40 were isolated from the intravenous analgesia group, and 24 were isolated from the epidural analgesia group; the gram-negative bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and fungi respectively accounted for 72.50%, 25.00%, and 2.50% in the intravenous analgesia group; the gram-negative bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and fungi respectively accounted for 66.66%, 29.17%, and 4.17% in the epidural analgesia group.The levels of CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8+ of the two groups of patients were reduced after the analgesia for 2 days, there was significant difference in the level of CD4+ or CD8+ of the intravenous analgesia group or the CD4+ level of the epidural analgesia group before the treatment and after the analgesia for 2 days(P<0.05).The CD4+/CD8+ level of the intravenous analgesia group and the levels of CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ of the epidural analgesia group were reduced after the analgesia for 2 days, however, there was no significant difference.CONCLUSIONThe incidence of postoperative infections of the epidural analgesia group is lower than that of the intravenous analgesia group; the two groups of patients are similar to the types of infection and constituent ratios of pathogens.The T lymphocyte subsets change to some extent after the analgesia for 2 days, however, the fluctuation is smaller in the epidural analgesia, and it is necessary to be further studied whether the change of T lymphocyte subsets is associated with the postoperative infections.

     

/

返回文章
返回