失效模式与效应分析对泌尿外科留置导尿患者尿路感染的影响

Effect of failure mode and effect analysis on urinary tract infections in patients with urological indwelling catheterization

  • 摘要: 目的 探究失效模式与效应分析(Fail Mode and Effect Analysis,FMEA)对泌尿外科留置导尿患者尿路感染的影响。方法 选取2013年3月-2016年4月于医院泌尿外科留置导尿管的374例患者作为研究对象,设2013年3月-2014年9月收治的180例患者为对照组,以2014年10月-2016年4月收治的194例患者为干预组。对照组行常规留置导尿管护理,干预组在对照组常规护理基础上行FMEA干预模式。比较两组患者尿路感染发生率及发生时间,对比两组患者导尿管留置天数、尿液细菌培养菌种检出率,比较护理人员手卫生依从性,计算并对比两组出现尿路感染的风险优先指数(Risk Priority Number,RPN)评分。结果 干预组患者发生尿路感染17例,感染率为8.76%,低于对照组41例,感染率为22.78%(P<0.05);对照组患者尿路感染发生时间为(12.64±3.91)天高于干预组(8.52±2.44)天(P<0.05);对照组尿液细菌培养检出率为20.56%高于干预组9.28%(P<0.05);干预组导尿管留置天数为6.8(5.5,9.0)天少于对照组的11.0(7.0,13.0)天(P<0.05)。干预组RPN评分为375分低于对照组1216分(P<0.05);干预组护理人员在进行导尿管护理前、后,接触患者前、后,尿液取样前、后手卫生执行率均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 失效模式与效应分析能有效降低留置导尿管患者尿路感染的发生率,推迟感染发生时间,为临床上与留置导尿管相关的尿路感染提供了切实有效的模式基础。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) on urinary tract infections in patients with indwelling catheter in department of urology. METHODS A total of 374 cases of patients with urological indwelling catheterization from Mar. 2013 to Apr. 2016 in hospital department of urology were selected as the research subjects. The 180 cases from Mar. 2013 to Sep. 2014 were set as control group, and 194 cases of patients admitted from Oct. 2014 to Apr. 2016 were set as intervention group. The control group received routine indwelling catheter care, and the intervention group received FMEA management model on the basis of control group. The incidence and time of occurrence of urinary tract infections were compared between the two groups, the indwelling catheter days, bacteria detection rate and hand hygiene compliance of nursing staff of the two groups were compared, and the urinary tract infection risk priority number (RPN) were calculated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS There were 17 cases of urinary tract infections in intervention group, with the infection rate of 8.76%, and 41 cases of urinary tract infections in control group, with the infection rate of 22.78%, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). The time of occurrence of urinary tract infections in control group was (12.64±3.91) days, which was significantly higher than (8.52±2.44) days of intervention group (P<0.05). The detection rate of urine bacterial culture was 20.56% in intervention group, which was significantly higher than 9.28% in control group (P<0.05). The catheter indwelling duration of the intervention group was 6.8 days(5.5,9.0), significantly shorter than 11.0 days (7.0,13.0) of the control group (P<0.05). The RPN score of intervention group was 375, which was lower than 1216 of control group (P<0.05). The rates of hand hygiene of nursing staff in the intervention group before and after the catheter care, before and after the contact with the patient, and before and after urine sampling were higher than those of control group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION The failure mode and effect analysis can effectively reduce the incidence rate of urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling urethral catheter, and delay the time of infection, which provides a practical and effective pattern basis for urinary tract infections associated with indwelling catheter.

     

/

返回文章
返回