常规超声和超声造影对肝脓肿患者的鉴别诊断

Differential diagnosis of infection-induced liver abscess with conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound

  • 摘要: 目的 探索常规超声和超声造影对肝脓肿患者的鉴别诊断效果。方法 回顾性分析2017年7月-2018年2月于天津医科大学总医院接受治疗的104例肝脓肿患者的临床资料,按照术前应用超声方法将患者分为常规超声组(n=48)和超声造影组(n=56)。统计患者临床资料并进行对比,对两组患者不同肝脓肿分期病灶诊断准确率进行统计,并分析超声造影患者不同肝脓肿分期动脉期高增强、门脉期及延迟期低增强、显示范围内增强等影像学表现特点。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、病程、病灶数量、临床症状、肝脓肿分期等临床资料对比均无统计学差异。超声造影组病灶诊断准确率为94.64%,高于常规超声组79.17%,其中脓肿炎性期、脓肿形成初期、脓肿形成期等不同分期均分别高于常规超声组,数据对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。超声造影组中动脉期高增强脓肿形成期构成比最高,为93.10%;门脉期及延迟期低增强脓肿炎性期构成比最高,为100.00%;显示范围内增强脓肿形成初期构成比最高,为94.12%,数据对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 超声造影不同肝脓肿分期影像学表现具有不同特点,临床医师可以根据该临床特点辅助诊断肝脓肿,且超声造影病灶诊断准确率显著高于常规超声,适合临床推广。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound on differential diagnosis of patients with liver abscess. METHODS The clinical data of 104 patients with liver abscess who were treated in General Hospital Affiliated to Tianjin Medical University from Jul 2017 to Feb 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, the patients were divided into the conventional ultrasound group with 48 cases and the ultrasound contrast group with 56 cases according to the type of ultrasound used before surgery. The clinical data of the patients were compared, the rates of accurate diagnosis of different stages of liver abscess were statistically analyzed, and the imaging characteristics of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound patients with different phases of liver abscess, including high enhancement of arterial phase, low enhancement of portal venous phase and delayed phase and enhancement in display range were observed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the clinical data such as gender, age, disease course, number of lesions, clinical symptom and phase of liver abscess between the two groups of patients. The rate of accurate diagnosis of lesions of the ultrasound contrast group was 94.64%, higher than 79.17% of the conventional ultrasound group, the rates of accurate diagnosis of abscess of inflammatory stage, abscess of preliminary formation stage and abscess of formation stage were significantly higher in the ultrasound contrast group than in the conventional ultrasound group (P<0.05). The percentage of the patients who had abscess of formation stage of high enhancement of arterial phase was the highest (93.10%) in the ultrasound contrast group, the percentage of the patients who had abscess of inflammatory stage of low enhancement of portal venous phase and delayed phase was the highest (100.00%), the percentage of the patients who had abscess of preliminary formation stage of enhancement in display range was the highest (94.12%), and there was significant difference (P<0.05). CONCLUSION The patients with different stages of liver abscess who receive the contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination show various imaging characteristics, which may help clinicians to diagnose the abscess; the rate of accurate diagnosis of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound is remarkably higher than that of the conventional ultrasound, and it is worthy to be promoted in hospitals.

     

/

返回文章
返回