重症监护病房单间与非单间医院感染率研究

Study on incidence of nosocomial infection between single and non-single wards in ICU

  • 摘要: 目的 研究重症监护病房(ICU)单间和非单间医院感染率前后对照情况,为医院ICU感染防控实践提供参考。方法 采用回顾性调查研究方法,选择2017年1月-2018年12月南京医科大学第一附属医院ICU住院患者为研究对象,以2018年1月新建ICU搬迁为时间截点,根据床位是否为单间,分为搬迁后新单间组和搬迁前非单间组。分析两组前后医院相关感染率差异。结果 323例单间组住院患者发生医院感染人数34人,医院感染率10.53%;246例非单间组住院患者发生医院感染人数35人,医院感染率14.23%。两组感染部位、三管感染千日率、耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)、耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)感染率差异均无统计学意义。单间组和非单间组耐碳青霉烯类鲍氏不动杆菌(CRAB)感染率分别为3.10%和8.13%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。结论 为降低ICU医院感染率,单间病房隔离措施作用有限,不能单纯依靠增加单间病房数量,而应落实环境清洁消毒、手卫生、隔离防护、抗菌药物合理使用等综合性措施。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To observe the incidence of nosocomial infection between the single and non-single wards in intensive care unit (ICU) so as to provide guidance for prevention and control of the nosocomial infection in ICU. METHODS By means of retrospective survey, the patients who were hospitalized in the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medicine University from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018 were recruited as the study objects. With the removal of ICU newly built in Jan 2018 as the time cutoff, the enrolled patients were divided into the single ward group and the non-single ward group according to the fact that whether the bed was in single ward. The incidence of nosocomial infection was compared between the two groups. RESULTS Among the 323 hospitalized patients in the single ward group, 34 had nosocomial infection, with the incidence of nosocomial infection 10.53%. Among the 246 hospitalized patients in the non-single ward, 35 had nosocomial infection, with the incidence of nosocomial infection 14.23%. There were no significant differences in the infection sites, thousand-day rate of three-tube-related infection, incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection between the two groups. The incidence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection was 3.10% in the single ward group, 8.13% in the non-single ward group, and there was significant difference (P=0.008). CONCLUSION The single ward achieves little effect on reducing the incidence of nosocomial infection, the increase of number of the single ward is not an effective way, and it is necessary to carry out the thorough cleaning and disinfection of environment, hand hygiene and isolation and reasonably use antibiotics.

     

/

返回文章
返回