ICU重症患者艰难梭菌感染情况及危险因素

Infection and risk factors of Clostridium difficile infection in patients in ICU

  • 摘要: 目的 分析重症监护室(ICU)患者艰难梭菌感染(CDI)情况及危险因素。方法 选取2018年6月-2020年7月锦州市中心医院ICU收治的重症患者118例,采集患者非重复新鲜粪便标本,对其进行选择性厌氧培养及毒素基因检测,同时经多位点序列分型(MLST)对毒素基因阳性的菌株进行分型,依据是否发生CDI分为CDI组、非CDI组,对其临床特征、实验室检查结果进行比较,分析发生CDI的危险因素,并比较CDI组、非CDI组入住ICU期间实验室指标及预后。结果 118例标本分离出艰难梭菌21株,CDI发生率为17.80%;经聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,检出A+B+型18株、A-B+型3株,未检出A-B-型及二元毒素基因(ctdA/ctdB),MLST结果显示,21株艰难梭菌ST型以ST2、ST3、ST35为主,分别占19.06%、14.29%、14.29%;多因素分析显示,年龄>55岁、入住ICU时间>8 d、APACHEⅡ评分、机械通气、抗生素使用时间>5 d、使用β内酰胺类抗生素、使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为导致ICU重症患者发生CDI的独立危险因素(P<0.05);CDI组住院时间较非CDI组延长,且入住ICU期间C反应蛋白(CRP)、血沉(ESR)、降钙素原(PCT)水平高于非CDI组,而白蛋白(ALB)水平低于非CDI组(P<0.05)。结论 ICU重症患者可能存在较高的CDI风险,且CDI有一定分子流行病学特征,对预后有影响,尤其是高龄、长期入住ICU、病情重、机械通气、抗生素使用时间长及使用β内酰胺类抗生素、PPI者应加强艰难梭菌检测。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To analyze the infection situation and risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection(CDI) in patients in intensive care unit(ICU). METHODS A total of 118 critically ill patients who were admitted to ICU of Jinzhou Central Hospital from Jun 2018 to Jul 2020 were enrolled. Non-repetitive fresh stool specimens were collected from patients to be used for selective anaerobic culture and toxin gene test. The typing of toxin gene-positive strains was conducted by multilocus sequence typing(MLST). According to the presence or absence of CDI, they were divided into the CDI group and non-CDI group. The clinical characteristics and laboratory test results between the two groups were compared; the risk factors for CDI were analyzed, and laboratory indexes and prognosis during hospitalization in ICU were compared. RESULTS Among the 118 specimens, 21 strains of C. difficile were isolated, with the incidence rate of 17.80%(21/118). The polymerase chain reaction(PCR) test showed that there were 18 strains of A+B+ type and 3 strains of A-B+ type, and no A-B- type genotype or binary toxin gene(ctdA/ctdB) were detected. MLST results showed that the ST types in the 21 strains of C. difficile were mainly ST2, ST3 and ST35, accounting for 19.06%, 14.29% and 14.29%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age older than 55 years old, stay time in ICU longer than 8 d, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, antibiotic usage time longer than 5 d, usage of stool specimens were collected from patients t(PPI) were independent risk factors for CDI in severely ill patients in ICU(P<0.05). The length of hospitalization stay in the CDI group was significantly longer than that in the non-CDI group; levels of C-reactive protein(CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) and procalcitonin(PCT) during hospitalization in ICU were significantly higher than those in the non-CDI group; level of albumin(ALB) was significantly lower than that in the non-CDI group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION There may be higher CDI risk in severely ill patients in ICU. CDI is of certain molecular epidemiological characteristics, which may effect on the prognosis. Special attention should be paid on patients, who were with elderly age, long-term hospitalization in ICU, critically ill, long mechanical ventilation and antibiotic usage time, usage of β-lactam antibiotics and PPI, and C. difficile detection should be carried out in them.

     

/

返回文章
返回