基于DRGs死亡风险分级的医院感染风险筛检方法及应用

Screening of risk for nosocomial infection based on DRGs death risk classification and their application

  • 摘要: 目的 探索基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)死亡风险分级的医院感染风险筛检方法及应用。方法 选取2021年1月1日-8月31日贵州医科大学附属医院出院患者86 920例为研究对象,对出院病例DRGs相关信息及医院感染情况进行分析。采用Pearson相关性分析DRG分组中死亡风险分级与医院感染发病率相关性,采用筛检试验评价指标评价不同死亡风险分级患者医院感染风险大小。结果 基于DRG死亡风险分组,从低风险组到高风险组,组别越高医院感染发病率呈上升趋势(P<0.05),且有一定相关性(P<0.05)。筛检试验结果显示,各死亡风险组别灵敏度均<30%,高风险组特异度较高(97.89%),阳性似然比为7.37。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行验证,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.75(95%CI为0.70~0.80)。结论 采用DRGs死亡风险分级用于医院感染风险筛检,其灵敏度较低,评价患者医院感染风险意义较小。但由于高风险组特异度和阳性似然比较高,因此可以在高风险组开展医院感染漏报调查,提高漏报调查效率。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the screening methods of risk for nosocomial infection based on diagnosis related groups (DRGs) death risk classification and observe their application. METHODS A total of 86 920 patients who were discharged from the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from Jan 1, 2021 to Aug 31,2021 were recruited as the research subjects. The DRGs-related information and prevalence of nosocomial infection were analyzed. Pearson correlation analysis was performed for the association between the DRG-based death risk classification and the incidence of nosocomial infection. The risk of nosocomial infection in the patients with different grades of death risk were evaluated by screening test evaluation indexes. RESULTS The patients were grouped based on DRG death risk, from the low risk group to the high risk group, the incidence of nosocomial infection showed an upward trend with the rise of grade(P<0.05), and there was certain relationship(P<0.05). The result of the screening test indicated that the sensitivity of all the death risk groups was less than 30%, the specificity was 97.89% in the high-risk group(97.89%), and the positive likelihood ratio was 7.37. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) was 0.75 (95%CI:0.70-0.80). CONCLUSION The sensitivity of the DRGs-based death risk classification is low for the screening of risk for nosocomial infection, and there is less significance in evaluating the risk of nosocomial infection. The specificity and positive likelihood ratio of the high risk group are high, and it is necessary to conduct a survey of missed report of nosocomial infection so as to raise the efficiency of survey of missed report.

     

/

返回文章
返回