滤除白细胞输血疗法对急性白血病患者的临床治疗效果

Efficacy of leukocyte-depleted blood transfusion in clinical treatment of patients with acute leukemia

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究滤除白细胞输血疗法与普通成分输血对急性白血病(AL)患者免疫、红细胞C3b受体花环率(RBC-C3bR)、输血反应和感染发生率的影响。
    方法 选取2022年1月-2023年12月于贵州省人民医院接受治疗的AL患者92例,依据简单随机法分为研究组和对照组各46例,对照组采取普通成分输血治疗,研究组采取滤除白细胞输血疗法治疗,比较两组输血前及输血1周后免疫功能、红细胞免疫功能RBC-C3bR、红细胞复合物花环率(RBC-ICR)、输血不良反应、血清炎症因子水平白细胞介素-4(IL-4)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、白细胞介素-2(IL-2)、γ干扰素(IFN-γ)和感染发生率。
    结果 输血后,两组CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+均显著升高(P<0.05),CD8+显著降低(P<0.05),两组输血前后CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+差值均有统计学意义(-10.92±3.70)% vs. (-6.14±3.71)%、(-6.41±2.83)% vs. (-4.48±2.21)%、-0.33±0.04 vs.-0.21±0.04,P<0.05,输血前后CD8+差值差异无统计学意义;输血后,两组RBC-C3bR均显著升高(P<0.05)、RBC-ICR均显著降低(P<0.05),且两组输血前后差值比较差异有统计学意义(-4.68±2.81)% vs. (-2.49±2.67)%、(3.55±2.13)% vs. (2.03±2.43)%,P<0.05;研究组输血不良反应总发生率为8.70%,低于对照组的23.91%(P<0.05);输血后,两组IL-4、IL-10、IL-2、IFN-γ均显著升高(P<0.05),且两组输血前后差值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组化疗期间感染总发生率为17.39%,低于对照组的36.96%(P<0.05)。
    结论 滤除白细胞输血疗法可显著降低AL化疗患者输血不良反应,改善机体免疫抑制和炎症水平,提高输血的安全性,有利于医院对AL患者的感染控制。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To explore the efficacies of leukocyte-depleted blood transfusion and common component blood transfusion therapy on immunity, RBC-C3b receptor rosette (RBC-C3bR), blood transfusion reactions and incidence rate of infection in patients with acute leukemia (AL).
    METHODS Ninety-two AL patients who received treatment in Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital from Jan. 2022 to Dec. 2023 were selected and were divided into the study and the control group by the simple randomization method with 46 cases in each group. The control group adopted common blood components transfusion therapy, while the study group was treated with leukocyte-depleted blood transfusion therapy. The immune function, red blood cell (RBC)immune function RBC-C3bR, RBC-immune complex rosette (RBC-ICR), adverse reactions, serum inflammatory factors interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and incidence rate of infection were compared between the two groups before and after 1 week of blood transfusion.
    RESULTS Compared with pretransfusion, posttransfusion CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels in the two groups significantly increased (P < 0.05); while CD8+ significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The differences of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ before and after transfusion were statistically different between the two groups (-10.92±3.70)% vs. (-6.14±3.71)%, (-6.41±2.83)% vs. (-4.48±2.21)%, -0.33±0.04 vs.-0.21±0.04, respectively, P < 0.05, while CD8+ showed no difference. Posttransfusion RBC-C3bR in both groups significantly raised and RBC-ICR was on the contrary (P < 0.05), and the differences before and after transfusion between the two groups were statistically different (-4.68±2.81)% vs. (-2.49±2.67)%, (3.55±2.13)% vs. (2.03±2.43)%, respectively P < 0.05. The total incidence rate of adverse reactions in the study group was 8.70%, lower than 23.91% in the control group (P < 0.05). The posttransfusion levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-2 and IFN-γ in the two groups elevated significantly compared with pretransfusion(P < 0.05), and the differences of the above levels before and after blood transfusion were statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The total incidence rate of infection during the chemotherapy in the study group with 17.39%, lower than 36.96% in the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS Leukocyte-depleting blood transfusion therapy can significantly reduce the adverse reactions of blood transfusion in patients with AL chemotherapy, ameliorate the suppression of immunity and inflammation and raise the safety of blood transfusion. It is beneficial for the infection control for AL patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回