心脏大血管外科医院感染危险因素及其预测模型构建

Risk factors and prediction model construction of healthcare-associated infections in cardiac vascular surgery

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究心脏大血管外科患者医院感染的危险因素及其预测模型, 并评估预测模型。
    方法 选择2020年6月-2023年6月华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院心脏大血管外科5 364例患者进行回顾性分析, 按照3∶1的比例将患者随机分为建模组(4 023例)和验证组(1 341例), 应用logistic回归分析建模组的医院感染危险因素, 根据相关系数β对各危险因素进行赋值, 构建医院感染风险评估模型, 利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验、校准曲线、决策曲线分析评价模型区分度、校准度和临床实用性。
    结果 本研究心脏大血管外科患者中医院感染321例, 医院感染发病率为5.98%, 医院感染例次数为343次, 医院感染发病例次率为6.39%。二元logistic回归分析结果显示, 住院时间(OR=2.970, 95%CI:1.588~5.552, P=0.001)、手术次数(OR=2.706, 95%CI:1.757~4.167, P<0.001)、手术时间(OR=2.143, 95%CI:1.491~3.080, P<0.001)、使用抗菌药物时间(OR=2.433, 95%CI:1.675~3.543, P<0.001)、联合应用抗菌药物(OR=2.228, 95%CI:1.403~3.541, P=0.001)、使用呼吸机(OR=4.095, 95%CI:2.408~6.964, P<0.001)是心脏大血管外科患者医院感染的危险因素。对各危险因素进行赋值, 将研究对象分为低、中、高风险组, 随着风险等级的升高, 医院感染发病率增高。模型组ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.845(95%CI:0.825~0.865), 验证组的AUC为0.823(95%CI:0.784~0.862), 已建立的风险评估模型具有较好的预测价值。
    结论 本研究构建的心脏大血管外科患者医院感染风险评估模型的预测准确度较好, 可用于识别高风险患者, 便于进行早期预防与干预, 从而有效地降低心脏大血管外科患者医院感染风险。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the risk factors for healthcare-associated infections in cardiovascular surgery patients and their predictive models, and to evaluate the predictive models.
    METHODS Totally 5 364 patients in the department of cardiovascular surgery of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from Jun. 2020 to Jun. 2023 were selected for retrospectively analysis, and the patients were randomly divided into a modeling group (4023 cases) and a validation group (1341 cases) according to the ration of 3∶1, the logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors for healthcare-associated infections in the modeling group, the value of each risk factor was assigned based on the correlation coefficient β, and the risk assessment model of healthcare-associated infections was constructed, and the discrimination, calibration and clinical practicality of the model were evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, the calibration curve and the decision curve analysis.
    RESULTS In this study, there were 321 cases of healthcare-associated infections among cardiothoracic and vascular surgery patients, with a healthcare-associated infection incidence rate of 5.98%, and the number of hospital-acquired infections cases was 343, with a hospital-acquired infection incidence rate of 6.39%. The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that the length of hospitalization (OR=2.970, 95%CI: 1.588-5.552, P=0.001), the number of surgical procedures (OR=2.706, 95%CI: 1.757-4.167, P < 0.001), the duration of surgery (OR=2.143, 95%CI: 1.491-3.080, P < 0.001), the application duration of antimicrobial agent (OR=2.433, 95%CI: 1.675-3.543, P < 0.001), the combined application of antimicrobial agents (OR=2.228, 95%CI: 1.403-3.541, P=0.001) and the employment of ventilator (OR=4.095, 95%CI: 2.408-6.964, P < 0.001) were risk factors for healthcare-associated infections in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Values were assigned to each risk factor, the study subjects were divided into low-, medium- and high-risk groups, with the incidence of hospital-acquired infections increasing as the risk level increased. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.845 (95%CI: 0.825-0.865) in the modeling group and 0.823 (95%CI: 0.784-0.862) in the validation group, suggesting that the established risk assessment model had a good predictive value.
    CONCLUSION The risk assessment model for healthcare-associated infections in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery constructed in this study has a good prediction accuracy, which can be used to identify high-risk patients and facilitate early prevention and intervention, thereby effectively reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

     

/

返回文章
返回