1株产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌鉴定方法

Identification methods of a strain of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过对比分析生化方法、基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和16S rRNA基因测序三种鉴定途径的效果,为临床微生物实验室鉴定产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌提供科学、合理的选择建议。
    方法 采用方法学评价进行分析。针对就诊于广东农垦中心医院的1例狗咬伤后引发败血症的患者3月27日分离的1株产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌,对其细菌形态、培养方式及菌落特性进行总结梳理。实验采用全自动微生物鉴定分析系统(梅里埃VITEK 2 Compact)、基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS,包括VITEK MS、MALDI Biotyper、Autof ms 1000和EX-Accuspec)以及16S rRNA基因测序技术对分离菌株进行鉴定,同时对各鉴定方法的性能进行评估比较。
    结果 产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌为专性厌氧的革兰阴性螺旋菌,其生长特点表现为生长缓慢,菌落呈现扁平和无色透明,氧化酶和触酶均呈阴性。在使用全自动微生物鉴定分析系统VITEK 2 Compact ANC卡进行鉴定时,未能成功识别该菌;而通过VITEK MS、MALDI Biotyper、Autof ms 1000和EX-Accuspec的鉴定,均确诊为产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌。此外,16S rRNA基因测序技术鉴定为产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌。
    结论 现有的全自动生化鉴定系统不能鉴定产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌,MALDL-TOF MS和16S rRNA基因测序技术可准确鉴定产琥珀酸厌氧螺菌,临床微生物工作人员可根据自身现有条件选择适当的鉴定方法。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To provide scientific and reasonable recommendations for the identification of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens in clinical microbiology laboratories by comparing the effectiveness of biochemical methods, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
    METHODS Methodological evaluation was conducted. A strain of A. succiniciproducens was isolated on Mar. 27, 2023 from a patient with sepsis caused by a dog bite, who was admitted to Guangdong Nongken Central Hospital, and analyzed for the morphological characteristics, culture methods, and colony features. The identification of the isolated strain was conducted by the automated microbial identification and analysis system (VITEK 2 Compact 2, bioMerieux), MALDI-TOF MS including VITEK MS, MALDI Biotyper, Autof ms 1000, and EX-Accuspec, as well as 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. The performance of each method was evaluated.
    RESULTS A. succiniciproducens was a strictly anaerobic gram-negative spiral bacterium, characterized by slow growth, flat and colorless transparent colonies, and negative oxidase and catalase activity. When using VITEK 2 Compact ANC card, it was not successfully recognized; however, through the identification by VITEK MS, MALDI Biotyper, Autof ms 1000 and EX-Accuspec, it was all confirmed as A. succiniciproducens. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology also identified it as A. succiniciproducens.
    CONCLUSIONS Current automated biochemical identification systems are unable to accurately identify A. succiniciproducens. MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing techniques can reliably confirm A. succiniciproducens. Clinical microbiologists should select the appropriate identification method based on their available resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回