口腔喷溅操作中气溶胶污染控制的仿真研究

Simulation study of aerosol contamination control in oral spattering operations

  • 摘要:
    目的 为探究口腔微生物气溶胶的污染控制措施有效性, 本研究对空气消毒机以及空调、牙科抽吸系统和含消毒因子诊疗用水在口腔喷溅诊疗环境中空气净化作用进行检测和分析。
    方法 选用108 CFU/ml白色葡萄球菌菌悬液, 以0.5 ml/min的速度缓释于仿头模树脂牙上, 模拟口腔唾液环境, 采用高速牙科手机对仿头模树脂牙进行20 min的下前牙牙体预备。以气溶胶净化措施的单独使用与联合使用进行实验分组, 通过安德森六级采样器以28.3 L/min的速度在距离喷溅源1.6 m处对空气进行5 min持续采样, 采样时间点为喷溅操作第15分钟及停止喷溅操作后第15分钟。以500 CFU/m3为标准对各组效果进行合格性评价。
    结果 在喷溅操作过程中, 牙科抽吸系统或含消毒因子诊疗用水与空气消毒机联合应用可有效降低空气含菌量(P<0.05), 空气含菌量下降达70%以上。自然通风组在喷溅操作过程中和结束后的空气含菌量与对照组无统计学差异。其他各实验组在喷溅操作结束后, 空气含菌量下降明显(P<0.05), 其中牙科抽吸系统或含消毒因子诊疗用水与空气消毒机联合应用空气含菌量下降率超过90%。空调对柜式消毒机的净化效能未产生显著干扰,在操作结束后各组空气合格率为100.00%。
    结论 口腔喷溅操作可造成广泛的诊疗环境微生物污染。自然通风短时间内无明显污染控制效果。牙科抽吸系统和含消毒因子诊疗用水作为污染源头控制措施, 对空气污染控制发挥了重要作用。空气消毒机发挥持续的空气净化作用。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the effectiveness of contamination control measures for oral microbial aerosols, this study tested and analyzed the role of air sterilizers, as well as air conditionings, dental suction systems and clinic water containing disinfection factors, in air purification in the oral spattering treatment environment.
    METHODS A 108 CFU/ml of Staphylococcus albicans bacterial suspension was selected and released slowly at a rate of 0.5 ml/min onto resin teeth of imitation head mold to simulate the oral saliva environment. A high-speed dental handpiece was used to prepare the lower anterior teeth for 20 min on the resin teeth. The study grouped the aerosol purification measures into separate and combined use, and the air was continuously sampled by an Anderson six-stage impact sampler at a rate of 28.3 L/min at a distance of 1.6 m from the spattering source for 5 min, at the 15th minute of the spattering operation and 15 minutes after stopping the spattering operation. The total number of colonies was calculated. The effect of each group was evaluated by the standard of 500 CFU/m3 for qualification.
    RESULTS During the spattering operations, air sterilizers combined with the dental suction systems or clinic water containing disinfection factors could effectively reduce the air bacterial content (P < 0.05), the airborne bacteria could be reduced over 70%. There was no statistically significant difference of airborne bacteria between the natural ventilation group and the control group during and after the spattering operation. The other experimental groups showed a significant decrease in airborne bacteria concentrations after the spattering operation (P < 0.05), especially when dental suction systems or the combined application of clinic water containing disinfection factors with air sterilizers, the airborne bacteria could be reduced over 90%. The air conditioner did not have remarkable interference on the parification efficiency of the cabinet-type air sterilizer.
    CONCLUSIONS Oral spattering operations can cause extensive microbial contamination in the treatment environment. Natural ventilation shows no significant contamination control effect in a short term. Dental suction system and clinic water containing disinfection factors play an important role in air pollution control as source control measures. Air sterilizers can play a continuous significant role in air purification.

     

/

返回文章
返回