无锡市22家医院软式内镜清洗消毒现状调查

Survey on current status of soft endoscopes cleaning and disinfection in 22 hospitals in Wuxi

  • 摘要:
    目的 目的调查无锡市医院软式内镜清洗消毒质量和管理现状, 分析存在问题和提出改进建议, 为内镜医院感染管理提供参考。
    方法 2024年9-11月调查软式内镜清洗消毒和管理情况, 抽取内镜进行三磷酸腺苷(ATP)生物荧光检测和细菌学检测, 对终末漂洗水、洗消人员手、消毒剂、环境物表进行细菌学检测。
    结果 68.18%医院清洗前每天测漏, 81.82%医院采用邻苯二甲醛;内镜灭菌中81.25%医院用过氧乙酸、仅1家用戊二醛, 86.36%医院每天工作前监测消毒剂浓度;不同级别医院人员在专职、学历、年龄和工作年限上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);内镜ATP样本60份, 合格率88.33%, 不同级别医院胃镜ATP检测合格率差异有统计学意义(P=0.032), 合格情况在内镜类型、酶洗时间上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);内镜细菌学样本60份, 均合格;环境细菌学样本141份, 合格率94.33%, 不合格主要为洗消人员手、漂洗槽水龙头和终末漂洗水, 1份不合格终末漂洗水经质谱分析有皮氏罗尔斯顿菌和沃氏葡萄球菌。
    结论 所调查医院内镜中心(室)整体设备和人力配置基本满足运行需要, 总体遵循内镜清洗消毒规范, 但在清洗消毒管理、设备维护、消毒剂浓度监测和人员培养等方面尚存不足, 并需进一步加强内镜及相关因素消毒质量监测。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the quality and management of cleaning and disinfection of soft endoscopes in Wuxi hospitals, to analyze the existing problems and put forward suggestions for improvement, and to provide references for endoscope-related infection in hospitals.
    METHODS From Sep. to Nov. 2024, the cleaning and disinfection status and managements of soft endoscopes were investigated. Endoscopes were sampling for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) biofluorescence and bacteriological testing; final rinsing water, hands of disinfection personnels, disinfectants and environmental surfaces were collected for bacteriological testing.
    RESULTS Totally 68.18% of hospitals performed daily leaks test before cleaning, and 81.82% used o-Phthalaldehyde; 81.25% of hospitals used peracetic acid in endoscopy sterilization, with only 1 hospital using glutaraldehyde. Totally 86.36% of hospitals monitored the concentration of disinfectants before daily works. There were statistically significant differences in full-time, education levels, age and working experience of personnels among different levels of hospitals (P < 0.05). The pass rate of the 60 endoscope ATP specimens was 88.33%, and there were statistically significant differences in the pass rate of gastroscopic ATP testing among different levels of hospitals (P= 0.032). The qualification status differed significantly in the types of endoscopes and the time length of enzyme washing (P < 0.05). All 60 endoscopic bacteriological samples were qualified, while 141 environmental bacteriological samples were with a pass rate of 94.33%. Unqualified samples were mainly for disinfection personnel′s hands, rinse tank faucets, final rinse water. Rolestonella piercei and Staphylococcus wolffii were detected in one failed final rinse water by mass spectrometry.
    CONCLUSIONS The overall equipment and staffing of the surveyed endoscope centers (rooms) basically meet operational needs and generally follow endoscope cleaning and disinfection guidelines. However, there are still deficiencies in cleaning and disinfection management, equipment maintenance, disinfectant concentration monitoring and personnel training. Further efforts are needed to strengthen the disinfection quality monitoring of endoscope and related factors.

     

/

返回文章
返回