基于正交试验设计的肠镜预处理优选方案的实践研究

Practical research on optimal preprocessing protocols for colonoscopes based on orthogonal experimental design

  • 摘要:
    目的 采用正交试验设计结合成本分析,探索肠镜预处理的优选方案。
    方法 2025年1-3月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院开展一项正交设计实验。对影响预处理的4个因素及对应的3水平按正交设计L9(34)形成9种不同预处理方案。将180例诊疗结束后的肠镜按随机数字表法分成9组,每组采用一种方案进行预处理。在预处理后、清洗后、消毒后进行三磷酸腺苷(ATP)检测和微生物培养。并对9种预处理方案进行成本分析。
    结果 A因素(预处理溶液种类)和C因素(预处理吸引时间)对预处理后的ATP值和菌落数影响差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。其中,A3和C2为最佳水平。A因素(预处理溶液种类)、B因素(预处理溶液更换频率)、C因素(预处理吸引时间)和D因素(预处理与清洗间隔时间)对清洗后的ATP值和菌落数影响均无统计学差异。9组清洗合格率均达到100.00%,消毒合格率≥90.00%。秩和检验显示,9组消毒后的ATP值(H=5.449,P=0.709)及菌落数差异均无统计学意义(H=1.770,P=0.987)。成本分析显示,预处理溶液为清水时成本最低。
    结论 肠镜预处理优选方案:肠镜预处理溶液为碱性溶液,更换频率为4 h一换,吸引时间为20 s,延迟时间根据临床具体情况确定,尽快进行清洗。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To explore the optimal preprocessing protocols for colonoscopes based on the orthogonal experimental design combined with cost analysis.
    METHODS An orthogonal design experiment was conducted in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical Hospital. Totally 4 influencing factors for preprocessing and 3 corresponding levels were formed to 9 types of preprocessing protocols on the bases of orthogonal design. The colonoscopes that were used for diagnosis and treatment of 180 patients were randomly divided into 9 groups, each group was treated with one preprocessing protocol. The adenosine triphosphatase (ATP) test and microbial culture were carried out after the preprocessing, cleaning and disinfection. The costs of the 9 preprocessing protocols were analyzed.
    RESULTS There were significant differences in the ATP value and bacterial colony counts between the factor A (the type of preprocessing solution) and the factor C (preprocessing suction time) after the preprocessing (all P < 0.05); A3 and C2 were the optimal levels. There were no significant differences in the ATP value and bacterial colony counts among the factor A (the type of preprocessing solution), the factor B (the change frequency of preprocessing solution), the factor C (the preprocessing suction time) and the factor D (the interval between preprocessing and the cleaning). The qualified rates of cleaning of all the 9 groups reached up to 100.00%, and the qualified rates of disinfection were no less than 90.00%. The result of rank sum test showed that there were no significant differences in the ATP value (H=5.449, P=0.709) and the bacterial colony counts (H=1.770, P=0.987) among the 9 groups after the disinfection. The cost analysis showed that the cost was lowest when water was used as the preprocessing solution.
    CONCLUSION The optimal protocol for preprocessing of colonoscopes is that the alkaline solution is used as the preprocessing solution, with the change frequency changing every 4 hours, the suction time 20 seconds; the delay time should be determined based on the specific clinical condition, and the colonoscopes should be cleaned as early as possible.

     

/

返回文章
返回