胸外科通仓交融手术室感染控制标准及管理规范的构建及效果评价

Construction and effect evaluation of infection control standards and management specifications for barn integrated operating rooms in thoracic surgery

  • 摘要:
    目的 构建胸外科通仓交融手术室感染控制标准及管理规范, 并进行初步验证, 为胸外科通仓交融手术室提供科学的参考依据。
    方法 研究采用文献研究法, 从数据库系统检索2013年2月-2023年2月间的相关信息, 构建胸外科通仓交融手术室感染控制标准及管理规范的初稿。为确保标准的科学性与实用性, 研究团队于2023年3月召开两轮专家会议, 邀请13名专家确定终稿。随后, 在2023年4月-2024年3月, 于上海市肺科医院开展初步应用试验:随机选取100例在通仓交融手术室手术的患者为研究组, 100例在常规手术室手术的患者为对照组, 通过比较术后胸腔出血、术后感染、术后肺部并发症、术中出血量、术后抗生素使用时长、患者满意度等指标, 评估方案效果。
    结果 经过两轮专家会议, 最终确定的方案涵盖环境管理、人员管理、物品与设备管理及卫生监测管理四个方面, 共提出26项具体措施。方案初步应用后, 两组患者在术后各项指标及患者满意度上无明显差异;两种手术室每月的空气培养结果均符合标准, 但通仓交融手术室的平均接台时间(15.76±9.18)min短于常规手术室(29.02±10.13)min(P<0.001)。
    结论 本研究构建的感控标准和管理规范具备科学性、可行性和实用性, 为通仓手术室的感染控制提供了坚实的理论依据和实践指导, 有效优化了手术室流程。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To establish infection control standards and management specifications for the barn integrated operating rooms in thoracic surgery, and to conduct preliminary verification, providing a scientific basis for the barn integrated operating rooms in thoracic surgery.
    METHODS This study employed a literature research method, retrieving relevant information from a database system spanning from Feb. 2013 to Feb. 2023, to construct the initial draft of infection control standards and management specifications for the barn integrated operating rooms in thoracic surgery. To ensure the scientificity and practicality of the standards, the research team convened two rounds of expert meetings in Mar. 2023, inviting 13 experts to finalize the draft. Subsequently, from Apr. 2023 to Mar. 2024, a preliminary application trial was conducted at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital: 100 patients undergoing surgery in the barn integrated operating rooms were randomly selected as the study group, and 100 patients undergoing surgery in the conventional operating rooms were selected as the control group. The effect of the protocol was evaluated by comparing indicators such as postoperative thoracic hemorrhage, postoperative infection, postoperative pulmonary complications, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative antibiotic use and patient satisfaction.
    RESULTS After two rounds of expert meetings, the finalized protocol encompassed four aspects: environmental management, personnel management, material and equipment management and hygiene monitoring management, with a total of 26 specific measures proposed. After the initial application of the protocol, there were no significant differences in postoperative indicators and patient satisfaction between the two groups of patients. The air culture results of both operating rooms met the standards each month, but the average turnover time in the barn integrated operating rooms (15.76±9.18 min) was lower than that in the conventional operating rooms (29.02±10.13 min) (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSION The infection control standards and management specifications established in this study are scientific, feasible and practical, providing a solid theoretical basis and practical guidance for infection control in the barn integrated operating rooms and effectively optimizing the operating room process.

     

/

返回文章
返回