宏基因二代测序技术检测细胞游离DNA对临床感染性疾病的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology in detecting cell-free DNA for clinical infectious diseases

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨宏基因二代测序技术(mNGS)通过检测外周血细胞游离DNA(cfDNA)对于感染性疾病诊断的价值。
    方法 收集2022年7月-2024年7月就诊于新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院且完善外周血mNGS检测的患者外周血mNGS、外周血培养数据以及传统病原学检测方法(真菌β-D-葡聚糖检测、GM试验、X-pert、虎红平板)的检测结果。根据临床最终诊断分为感染组与非感染组,系统对比mNGS以及传统检测方法对感染性疾病的诊断效率及结果一致性等。
    结果 本研究最终纳入患者230例,感染组131例,非感染组99例。mNGS方法曲线下面积(AUC)高于血培养及传统病原学方法(0.666 vs. 0.580 vs. 0.619)。利用mNGS检测外周血cfDNA与血培养比较,病原体额外检出率为62.60%,与传统病原体检测方法比较,病原体额外检出率为45.80%。mNGS检测外周血cfDNA与血培养检测结果一致性不佳(Kappa=0.266, P<0.001)。通过mNGS检测外周血cfDNA的方法检出贝纳特柯克斯体、鹦鹉热衣原体、结核分枝杆菌复合群。
    结论 利用mNGS检测外周血cfDNA在感染性疾病的诊断效率、检测覆盖面明显优于血培养及传统病原学检测方法,在感染性疾病的诊断方面体现出显著优势,可作为临床识别特殊病原体及隐匿性感染的有效检测手段。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To explore the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology (mNGS) in diagnosing infectious diseases by detecting cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood.
    METHODS Peripheral blood mNGS, peripheral blood culture data and results of traditional etiological detection methods (fungal β-D-glucan test, GM test, X-pert, Rose Bengal plate test) were collected from patients who visited the People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from Jul. 2022 to Jul. 2024 and underwent peripheral blood mNGS detection. Patients were divided into infected and non-infected groups based on their final clinical diagnosis. The diagnostic efficiency and result consistency of mNGS and traditional detection methods for infectious diseases were systematically compared.
    RESULTS A total of 230 patients were included in this study, with 131 in the infected group and 99 in the non-infected group. The area under the curve (AUC) for the mNGS method was higher than that for blood culture and traditional etiological methods (0.666 vs. 0.580 vs. 0.619, respectively). Compared with blood culture, mNGS detection of peripheral blood cfDNA showed an additional pathogen detection rate of 62.60%, and compared with traditional pathogen detection methods, it showed an additional pathogen detection rate of 45.80%. The result consistency between mNGS detection of peripheral blood cfDNA and blood culture detection was poor (Kappa=0.266, P < 0.001). mNGS was used to detect peripheral blood cfDNA, and Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia psittaci and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were detected.
    CONCLUSIONS The use of mNGS to detect peripheral blood cfDNA demonstrates significantly superior diagnostic efficiency and detection coverage for infectious diseases compared to blood culture and traditional etiological detection methods. It exhibits significant advantages in the diagnosis of infectious diseases and can serve as an effective detection method for clinically identifying special pathogens and occult infections.

     

/

返回文章
返回