某中医院重症监护室耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌感染疑似暴发调查与控制

Investigation and control of suspected outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in the intensive care unit of a traditional Chinese medicine hospital

  • 摘要:
    目的 调查某中医院重症监护室一起耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染疑似暴发, 确定感染源和传播途径, 为CRKP感染防控提供依据。
    方法 对2024年7月绥阳县中医医院发现的5例CRKP感染或定植患者进行流行病学调查, 采集患者、病房环境和手卫生样本查找CRKP。选取14株CRKP进行耐碳青霉烯酶基因检测, 并采用肠杆菌基因间重复一致序列(ERIC-PCR)和多位点序列分型(MLST)对菌株进行同源性分析。
    结果 5例患者年龄中位数为73岁, 均接受多项侵入性操作。环境监测显示CRKP阳性率为26.35%, 在医务人员手部、病房物体表面及医疗设备表面均检出CRKP。对14株CRKP进行基因分析, 发现均携带KPC耐药基因, 除患者1外, 其他菌株均携带VIM基因;MLST显示CRKP属于ST48序列型, ERIC-PCR显示属于两种不同的基因型, 患者1为A基因型, 其余患者及环境物表分离菌株均为B基因型。加强患者隔离及分组诊疗, 严格病房环境和医疗设备清洁消毒, 严格手卫生等措施后, 感染得到有效控制。
    结论 病房环境和医疗设备清洁消毒不彻底、手卫生执行不到位是导致此次疑似CRKP感染暴发的主要原因;同源性分析发现可能存在2条独立的传播链。及时发现并管理感染源、切断传播途径、保护易感人群, 同时采取一系列感控措施是有效控制感染暴发的关键。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate a suspected outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection in the intensive care unit of a traditional Chinese medicine hospital, identify the source of infection and transmission routes, and provide a basis for prevention and control of CRKP infection.
    METHODS Epidemiological investigations were conducted on five patients with CRKP infections or colonization who were identified in Jul. 2024 at Suiyang County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Samples were collected from patients, the ward environments, and hand surfaces to detect CRKP. Fourteen CRKP isolates were selected for carbapenemase gene testing, and homology analysis was performed by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
    RESULTS The median age of the five cases was 73 years, and all had undergone multiple invasive procedures. Environmental monitoring showed a CRKP positive rate of 26.35%, with CRKP isolates detected on the hands of healthcare workers, surfaces in the wards and medical equipment surfaces. Genetic analysis showed that all 14 CRKP strains carried the KPC resistance gene; except for case 1, other strains carried the VIM gene. MLST identified CRKP of all strains as sequence type 48 (ST48); while ERIC-PCR revealed two distinct genotypes: genotype A for case 1 and genotype B for the other cases and environmental isolates. After strengthening patient isolation and group treatment, strictly cleaning and disinfecting the ward environments and medical equipment, and strictly implementing hand hygiene, the infection was effectively controlled.
    CONCLUSIONS Inadequate disinfection of the ward environments and medical equipment and poor compliance with hand hygiene are the main contributors to the suspected CRKP outbreak. Homology analysis suggests the existence of two independent transmission chains. Timely identification and management of the infection sources, interruption of transmission routes, protection of susceptible individuals and implementation of comprehensive infection control measures are essential for effective outbreak control.

     

/

返回文章
返回