基于中断时间序列回归评价抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率干预措施的效果

Evaluation of effects of intervention measures to etiological submission rates before antimicrobial therapy based on interrupted time series regression analysis

  • 摘要:
    目的 评估实施提高抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率系列干预措施后送检情况的变化,以优化抗菌药物应用管理。
    方法 研究对象为苏州大学附属第一医院2021年7月-2024年6月医嘱目的为治疗使用抗菌药物的97 146例住院患者,以2023年1月为干预节点,2021年7月-2022年12月设为干预前组,2023年1月-2024年6月设为干预后组,使用中断时间序列分析干预前后抗菌药物病原学送检率的变化趋势,利用卡方检验评估多重耐药菌检出率与医院感染率的变化。
    结果 实施干预后,抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率、联合使用重点药物前病原学送检率和医院感染诊断相关病原学送检率较干预前呈上升趋势(均P<0.05)。中断时间序列分析结果表明长期效益上看干预措施能提高限制级、特殊级及总体抗菌药物的治疗前病原学送检率,净效益分别为0.85%、0.67%和0.68% (均P<0.05),但联合使用重点药物病原学送检率无统计学差异。干预后多重耐药菌医院感染率由0.46%降低至0.27% (P<0.001);多重耐药菌检出率为25.73%,与干预前27.47%比较,无统计学差异。
    结论 科学合理的干预能有效提升抗菌药物治疗前的病原学送检率,但是联合使用重点药物的病原学送检以及多重耐药菌检出未明显改善,需要进一步制定针对性干预措施,促进院感高质量发展。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the changes of etiological submission rates before the antimicrobial therapy after a series of intervention measures were taken so as to optimize the use and management of antibiotics.
    METHODS A total of 97, 146 patients who were hospitalized and treated with antibiotics in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from Jul. 2021 to Jun. 2024 were recruited as the research subjects. Jan. 2023 was set as the time node of intervention, the time period from Jul. 2021 to Dec. 2022 was assigned as the pre-intervention group, and the time period from Jan. 2023 to Jun. 2024 was assigned as the post-intervention group. The etiological submission rates before the antimicrobial therapy were observed by interrupted time series before and after the intervention measures were taken. The changes of isolation rates of multidrug-resistant organisms and incidence of hospital-associated infections were estimated by chi-square test.
    RESULTS The etiological submission rates before the antimicrobial therapy, etiological submission rates before combined use of major antibiotics and etiological submission rates relating to diagnosis of hospital-associated infections were higher after the intervention than before the intervention(all P < 0.05). The interrupted time series analysis showed that from the perspective of long-term benefit, the intervention measures could raise the etiological submission rates before the use of restricted, special grades of antibiotics and general antibiotics, and the net benefits were 0.85%, 0.67% and 0.68%, respectively (all P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the etiological submission rate before the combined use of major antibiotics. After the intervention, the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms infection decreased from 0.46% to 0.27% (P < 0.001); the isolation rate of multidrug-resistant organisms was 25.73% after the intervention, 27.47% before the intervention, and there was no significant difference.
    CONCLUSIONS Scientific and reasonable interventions may effectively raise the etiological submission rates before the antimicrobial therapy, however, the etiological submission rate for combined use of major antibiotics and the isolation rate of multidrug-resistant organisms are not improved remarkably. It is necessary to further formulate targeted intervention measures so as to push forward high-quality development of infection control.

     

/

返回文章
返回