HIV合并结核分枝杆菌/非结核分枝杆菌感染相关免疫重建炎症综合征临床特征

Clinical characteristics of HIV complicated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis/nontuberculous Mycobacteria infections-associated immunereconstitution inflammatory syndrome

  • 摘要: 目的 研究人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)合并分枝杆菌包括结核分枝杆菌(MTB)或非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)感染的患者抗反转录病毒治疗(ART)后并发免疫重建炎症综合征(IRIS)的临床特征。方法 选取2017年1月-2024年12月南京市第二医院收治的HIV合并分枝杆菌感染ART后并发IRIS患者共51例,其中MTB相关IRIS(TB-IRIS)32例,NTM相关IRIS(NTM-IRIS)19例。比较两组一般资料、临床特征,分别比较两组启动ART前和确诊IRIS时实验室检测指标变化。结果 TB-IRIS组确诊后3月内病死率0.00%(0/32),NTM-IRIS组确诊后3月内病死率5.26%(1/19),无统计学差异(χ2=0.071;P=0.790)。患者确诊为IRIS时,TB-IRIS组淋巴结累及发生率28.13%(9/32)高于NTM-IRIS组3.13%(1/32)(P=0.047)。TB-IRIS组多发淋巴结肿大发生率50.00%(16/32)高于NTM-IRIS组15.79%(3/19)(P=0.015)。确诊IRIS时,TB-IRIS组CD4+T淋巴细胞计数水平高于启动ART前(P=0.002),HIV病载低于启动ART前(P=0.001)。确诊IRIS时,NTM-IRIS组血红蛋白水平高于启动ART前(P=0.028),HIV病载低于启动ART前(P=0.020)。启动ART前,TB-IRIS组和NTM-IRIS组,各实验室指标水平比较无统计学差异。确诊IRIS时,TB-IRIS组CD4+T淋巴细胞计数水平高于NTM-IRIS组(P=0.043)。结论 HIV合并分枝杆菌感染相关IRIS尚无特异性诊断手段,容易漏诊、误诊。本研究为临床诊治TB-IRIS和NTM-IRIS提供思路。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To analyze the clinical features of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in the patients with co-infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Mycobacterium including Mycobacteria tuberculosis (MTB) or nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) after antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS A total of 51 patients with mycobacterial-IRIS who were treated in the Second Hospital of Nanjing from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2024 were enrolled in the study. Among them, 32 cases were MTB-related IRIS (TB-IRIS), and 19 cases were NTM-related IRIS (NTM-IRIS). A retrospective analysis was performed on the demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and examination data of these 51 patients. The baseline data and clinical features were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the clinical laboratory test indexes were observed and compared between the two groups before the start of ART and at the confirmed diagnosis of IRIS. RESULTS The mortality rate was 0.00% (0/32) in the TB-IRIS group within 3 months after the conformed diagnosis, 5.26%(1/19) in the NTM-IRIS group, and there was no significant difference (χ2=0.071;P=0.790). At the time of confirmed diagnosis of IRIS, the incidence of lymph node involvement was 28.13% (9/32) in the TB-IRIS group, higher than 3.13% (1/32) in the NTM-IRIS group (P=0.047). The incidence of multiple lymphadenopathy was 50.00% (16/32) in the TB-IRIS group, 15.79% (3/19) in the NTM-IRIS group (P=0.015). The CD4+T lymphocyte counts of the TB-IRIS group was significantly higher at the conformed diagnosis of IRIS than before ART initiation (P=0.002), while the HIV viral load was significantly lower at the conformed diagnosis of IRIS than before ART initiation (P=0.001). The hemoglobin level of the NTM-IRIS group was remarkably higher at the conformed diagnosis of IRIS diagnosis than before ART initiation (P=0.028), and the HIV viral load was lower at the conformed diagnosis of IRIS than before ART initiation (P=0.020). There were no significant differences in the levels of clinical laboratory test indexes between the TB-IRIS group and the NTM-IRIS group before the ART initiation. The CD4+T lymphocyte level of the TB-IRIS group was higher than that of the NTM-IRIS group at the confirmed diagnosis of IRIS (P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS There is no specific test for diagnosis of co-infection of HIV and Mycobacteria-associated IRIS, and it may easily cause misdiagnosis. This study provides new ideas for clinical diagnosis and treatment of TB-IRIS and NTM-IRIS.

     

/

返回文章
返回