PCT/LYM联合炎症负担指数对脓毒症早期识别及休克预警的价值

Values of PCT/LYM combined with inflammatory burden indexes in early identification of sepsis and early warning of septic shock

  • 摘要: 目的 评估降钙素原/淋巴细胞计数比值(PCT/LYM)及炎症负担指数(IBI)对脓毒症的早期识别和脓毒性休克预警价值,解决单一生物标志物诊断效能不足的临床难题。方法 回顾性纳入2020年10月-2025年5月开封市中心医院收治的78例脓毒症患者(脓毒症组37例,脓毒症休克组41例)及54例非脓毒性感染性炎症患者为对照组。收集所有患者明确诊断时间节点的降钙素原(PCT)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、中性粒细胞计数(NEU)及淋巴细胞计数(LYM),计算中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、PCT/LYM与IBI。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各指标的诊断效能。结果 脓毒症组和脓毒性休克组的PCT、LYM、LYM/CRP、PCT/LYM、IBI、NLR水平与对照组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05); 脓毒性休克组的PCT、CRP、LYM/CRP、IBI水平均高于脓毒症组(P<0.05)。PCT/LYM诊断脓毒症的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.859(95%CI: 0.717~0.898),截断值为0.903时,灵敏度81.08%、特异度81.48%; IBI预警脓毒性休克的AUC为0.900(95%CI: 0.836~0.964),截断值为99.77时,灵敏度82.93%、特异度81.48%; CRP/LYM≤237.40时排除休克的特异度达85.19%。结论 PCT/LYM是脓毒症早期识别的高效标志物,IBI对脓毒性休克具有优异预警价值,二者联合为急诊分层干预提供新策略。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the values of the ratio of procalcitonin to lymphocytes counts (PCT/LYM) and inflammatory burden indexes (IBI) in early identification of sepsis and early warning of septic shock so as to clinical problems like the insufficient diagnostic efficiency with single biomarker. METHODS A total of 78 sepsis patients (with 37 cases in the sepsis group, 41 cases in the septic shock group) who were treated in Kaifeng Central Hospital from Oct. 2020 to May. 2025 were retrospectively enrolled in the study, and 54 patients who had non-septic infectious inflammations were chosen as the control group. The data regarding the procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophils counts (NEU) and lymphocytes (LYM) at the time points of definite diagnosis were collected from all of the patients. The ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR), PCT/LYM and IBI were calculated. The diagnostic efficiencies of the indexes were analyzed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS There were significant differences in the levels of PCT, LYM, LYM/CRP, PCT/LYM, IBI and NLR between the sepsis group and the septic shock group (P<0.05). The levels of PCT, CRP, LYM/CRP and IBI of the septic shock group were higher than those of the sepsis group(P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the PCT/LYM was 0.859(95%CI: 0.717 to 0.898) in diagnosis of sepsis, with the cutoff value 0.903, the sensitivity 81.08%, the specificity 81.48%. The AUC of the IBI was 0.900(95%CI: 0.836 to 0.964)in early warning of septic shock, with the cutoff value 99.77, the sensitivity 82.93%, the specificity 81.48%; when the CRP/LYM was no more than 237.40, the specificity for ruling out the shock reached up to 85.19%. CONCLUSIONS PCT/LYM is a highly efficient marker for early identification of sepsis. IBI has excellent value in early warning of septic shock. The combination of the two indexes may provide new strategies for emergency stratified intervention.

     

/

返回文章
返回