北京市259所医疗卫生机构血源性职业暴露防控现状

Current status of bloodborne occupational exposure prevention and control in 259 healthcare institutions of Beijing

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解医疗卫生机构血源性职业暴露防控现状,为有针对性地改善防控体系建设提供参考。
    方法 采用便利抽样的方法选取北京市259所医疗卫生机构作为研究对象,于2024年12月回顾性调查各机构近1年血源性职业暴露防控情况,通过自行设计的三类20项条目的调查表,收集机构和人员基本信息、职业卫生安全文化评估数据、血源性职业暴露的“5E”伤害预防策略落实情况,分析机构职业卫生安全文化建设与预防策略的落实情况。
    结果 调查的各机构职业卫生安全文化得分与血源性职业暴露“5E”预防策略的落实率较好,平均得分率和落实率分别为91.52%、85.79%。但职业卫生安全文化评分中,将个人职业安全卫生责任制纳入年度绩效评估的得分率最低为85.48%。“5E”预防策略落实情况中,制订血源性职业暴露管理相关规章制度并查核的执行率最低(77.99%);一年内通过减少环境危险因素降低员工血源性职业暴露案例的率次较低(82.24%)。各机构职业卫生安全文化建设与预防策略的落实存在一定的改善空间。
    结论 建议将职业安全卫生责任制纳入绩效评估指标,增加职业卫生安全文化建设投入,促进血源性职业暴露相关法规出台;充分发挥医务人员职业防护的积极性,改进血源性职业暴露预防和管控流程,确保制度落实;改善医疗职业环境,推动医工合作;提升血源性职业暴露防控体系建设,保障医护人员的职业安全。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE  To investigate the current status of bloodborne occupational exposure prevention and control in healthcare institutions, providing references for targeted improvements in the prevention and control system.
    METHODS  A convenience sampling method was adopted to select 259 healthcare institutions in Beijing as the study subjects. A retrospective survey was conducted in Dec. 2024 to assess the bloodborne occupational exposure prevention and control measures implemented in these institutions over the past year. Data were collected through a self-designed questionnaire comprising 20 items across three categories, including basic information on institutions and personnel, occupational health and safety culture assessment and the implementation status of the "5E" injury prevention strategy for bloodborne occupational exposure. The study analyzed the occupational health and safety culture construction and the implementation of the prevention strategy in the institutions.
    RESULTS  The surveyed institutions demonstrated relatively high scores in occupational health and safety culture and implementation rates of the "5E" prevention strategy for bloodborne occupational exposure, with average score and implementation rates of 91.52% and 85.79%, respectively. However, among the occupational health and safety culture scores, the inclusion of individual occupational safety and health responsibility in annual performance evaluations had the lowest score rate (85.48%). Regarding the implementation of the "5E" prevention strategy, the establishment and enforcement of regulations related to bloodborne occupational exposure management had the lowest implementation rate (77.99%), and the rate of reducing employee bloodborne occupational exposure cases by mitigating environmental risk factors within one year was also relatively low (82.24%). There was still some room for improvement in both occupational health and safety culture construction and the implementation of prevention strategies across institutions.
    CONCLUSIONS  It is recommended to incorporate occupational safety and health responsibility into performance evaluation metrics, increase investment in occupational health and safety culture construction, and promote the formulation of regulations related to bloodborne occupational exposure. Efforts should be made to enhance healthcare workers' motivation for occupational protection, improve prevention and control processes for bloodborne occupational exposure, and ensure policy enforcement. Additionally, the medical occupational environment should be optimized to foster collaboration between healthcare workers and staff, thereby strengthening the bloodborne occupational exposure prevention and control system construction and safeguarding the occupational safety of healthcare workers.

     

/

返回文章
返回