脑内血肿清除术后医院感染危险因素及其列线图模型构建与评价

Risk factors for postoperative hospital-associated infections in patients undergoing intracerebral hematoma evacuation and effectiveness of nomogram model

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨脑内血肿清除术后患者医院感染的危险因素,构建列线图预测模型并进行评价。
    方法  回顾性分析2020年1月-2024年12月甘肃省人民医院脑内血肿清除术患者231例的临床资料,根据是否发生医院感染分为感染组86例和非感染组145例。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析医院感染的危险因素,基于多因素分析结果构建列线图风险预测模型,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Bootstrap方法、Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验及临床决策(DCA)曲线评估模型性能。
    结果  231 例患者中医院感染率为37.23%(86/231),累计感染91例次,其中下呼吸道感染占比最高(89.01%)。手术时间(OR=1.005,95%CI:1.002~1.009,P=0.003)、中心静脉置管时间(OR=1.092,95%CI:1.029~1.159,P=0.004)、脑室引流时间(OR=1.136,95%CI:1.006~1.282,P=0.040)是脑内血肿清除术患者医院感染的危险因素。基于上述独立危险因素构建列线图模型:校准曲线显示列线图预测结果与实际结果一致性良好,平均绝对误差为0.032,Bootstrap方法验证显示校准曲线的平均绝对误差为0.048,模型稳定性良好;Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验提示模型拟合度较好(χ2=8.010,P=0.424);说明校准曲线与理想曲线贴合良好。ROC曲线显示曲线下面积为0.900(95%CI:0.865~0.945),模型区分度良好;DCA曲线显示,高风险阈值概率在0.08~0.88时,模型临床净收益较高,具备实际应用价值。
    结论  脑内血肿清除术后医院感染率较高,手术时间、中心静脉置管时间、脑室引流时间是医院感染的危险因素,本研究构建的列线图模型预测性能良好,可为临床早期识别高危患者及制定个体化防控策略提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE  To explore the risk factors of hospital-associated infection in patients undergoing intracerebral hematoma evacuation, and to construct and evaluate a nomogram prediction model.
    METHODS  A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 231 patients who underwent intracerebral hematoma evacuation at Gansu Provincial Hospital from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2024. These patients were divided into an infection group (n=86) and a non-infection group (n=145) based on whether they developed hospital-associated infection. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for hospital-associated infection. Based on the results of the multivariate analysis, a nomogram risk prediction model was constructed, and its performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Bootstrap method, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve.
    RESULTS  Among 231 patients, the hospital-associated infection rate was 37.23% (86/231), with a cumulative infection of 91 cases. Lower respiratory tract infection accounted for the highest proportion (89.01%). Operation duration (OR=1.005, 95% CI: 1.002−1.009, P=0.003), central venous catheterization duration (OR=1.092, 95% CI: 1.029−1.159, P=0.004) and duration of ventricular drainage (OR=1.136, 95% CI: 1.006−1.282, P=0.040) were identified as risk factors for hospital-associated infection in patients undergoing intracerebral hematoma evacuation (P<0.05). Based on the aforementioned independent risk factors, a nomogram model was constructed. The calibration curve demonstrated good consistency between the predicted and actual outcomes with a mean absolute error of 0.032. Bootstrap method validation indicated a mean absolute error of 0.048 for the calibration curve, indicating good model stability. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test suggested good model fit (χ2=8.010, P=0.424), indicating a good fit between the calibration curve and the ideal curve. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.865-0.945), indicating good discriminatory power of the model. The DCA curve indicated that the model had high clinical net benefit when the high-risk threshold probability ranged from 0.08 to 0.88, making it valuable for practical application.
    CONCLUSIONS  The hospital-associated infection rate after intracerebral hematoma evacuation is relatively high. Operation duration, central venous catheterization duration and ventricular drainage duration are risk factors for hospital-associated infection. The nomogram model constructed in this study demonstrates good prediction performance and can provide a reference for early identification of high-risk patients and the development of individualized prevention and control strategies in clinical practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回