耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌流行地区入院单次筛查策略的成本效益评估

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of a single-screening strategy in areas prevalent for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae upon admission

  • 摘要:
    目的 评估在高流行地区实施入院单次碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌(CRE)筛查的有效性和卫生经济学效益。
    方法 采用微模拟建模方法,分析入院单次筛查策略对上海市四家三甲医院2010-2020年收治的1 000名ICU患者的影响,主要结局包括CRE相关感染率、菌血症、肺部感染、尿路感染、病死率、住院时间及医疗成本。假设筛查结果在24 h内报告,并对所有筛查阳性患者实施隔离措施。研究数据来源于国内多家综合医院的回顾性分析,并结合国内外相关文献进行验证。
    结果 实施入院单次筛查可使CRE相关感染率下降22‰(由35‰下降至13‰),菌血症发生率下降8‰(由15‰降至7‰),肺部感染发生率下降6‰(由12‰降至6‰),尿路感染发生率下降5‰(由8‰降至3‰)。筛查的增量成本−效果比(ICER)为−1 544.45元/质量调整生命年(QALY),在流行率≥5%的环境下,该策略在大多数情景下具有成本效益。
    结论 入院单次CRE筛查在高流行地区ICU可降低感染率、减少交叉传播并改善预后。尽管受筛查方法、隔离依从性及检测延迟等因素影响,该策略在CRE高流行环境下具有一定价值。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE  To evaluate the effectiveness and health economic benefits of implementing a single-screening strategy upon admission for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in high-prevalence areas.
    METHODS  Microsimulation modeling was adopted to analyze the impact of a single-screening strategy upon admission on 1 000 patients admitted to the ICU of four three-A hospitals in Shanghai from 2010 to 2020. The primary outcomes included CRE-related infection rates, bacteremia, pulmonary infections, urinary tract infections, mortality rates, length of hospital stay and medical costs. It was assumed that screening results were reported within 24 hours, and isolation measures were implemented for all patients who tested positive. The study data were derived from retrospective analyses of multiple general hospitals in China and validated with relevant domestic and international literature.
    RESULTS  Implementing a single-screening strategy upon admission reduced the CRE-related infection rate by 22‰ (declining from 35‰ to 13‰), the incidence of bacteremia by 8‰ (from 15‰ to 7‰), the incidence of pulmonary infections by 6‰ (from 12‰ to 6‰) and the incidence of urinary tract infections by 5‰ (from 8‰ to 3‰). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of screening was -1 544.45 yuan per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and the strategy was cost-effective in most scenarios in environments with a prevalence rate ≥5%.
    CONCLUSIONS  A single-screening strategy for CRE upon admission in ICUs in high-prevalence areas can reduce infection rates, decrease cross-transmission, and improve prognosis. Although influenced by factors such as screening methods, isolation compliance and detection delays, this strategy holds value in environments with a high prevalence of CRE.

     

/

返回文章
返回