量化风险矩阵协同病例组合指数的医院感染风险管理体系构建与应用

Construction and application of health care-associated infection risk management system integrating quantitative risk matrix and case-mix index

  • 摘要: 目的 探索医院感染风险管理体系构建,优化风险评估矩阵,实现精准量化的风险评估,助力专职人员高效完成医院层面的风险评估管理工作。方法 获取2024年1-12月贵州省人民医院44个临床科室感染相关的基线数值,构建风险管理矩阵。通过德尔菲法与头脑风暴法确定4个风险识别指标,即医院感染患者多、MDROs患者多、传染病患者多以及侵入性操作患者多,从发生风险可能性、后果严重程度和当前体系这3个维度应用于风险矩阵法,并结合病例组合指数(CMI)进行百分位排序实施综合测评。结果 经CMI调整评估分值后,对44个临床科室开展风险等级评定,得出内科系统4个极高风险科室为急诊内科、心内科、血液内科和感染科; ICU系统1个极高风险科室为重症医学科; 外科系统5个极高风险科室为心外科、神经外科、肝胆外科三部、急诊外科和胸外科。结论 基于CMI调整评估分值,以精准量化的风险评估矩阵为评判标准的医院感染风险管理体系,可使评估结果更科学合理、贴合临床实际,进一步增强风险管理决策性,提升医院的管理水平。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the construction of a health care-associated infection risk management system, optimize the risk assessment matrix, achieve precise and quantitative risk assessment, and assist dedicated personnel in efficiently completing hospital-level risk assessment and management work. METHODS The baseline values that were related to infections were obtained from 44 clinical departments of Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital from Jan. 2024 to Dec. 2024. A risk management matrix was constructed. Totally 4 risk identification indicators, namely, a large number of patients with HAIs, a large number of patients with MDROs, a large number of patients with infectious diseases and a large number of patients undergoing invasive procedures, were determined by the Delphi method and brainstorming. These indicators were applied to the risk matrix method from three dimensions: the possibility of risk, severity of consequences, and the current system, and a percentile ranking was carried out for comprehensive assessment with the combination of case-mix index (CMI). RESULTS The risk rating was estimated for the 44 clinical departments after the assessment scores were adjusted based on CMI, and it was concluded that 4 extremely high risk departments involving internal medicine system were as follows: emergency internal medicine department, cardiology department, hematology department and infectious disease department; 1 extremely high risk department involving ICU system was critical care medicine department; 5 extremely high risk department involving surgery system were as follows: cardiac surgery department, neurosurgery department, third department of hepatobiliary surgery, emergency surgery department and thoracic surgery department. CONCLUSION The HAIs risk management system that sets the precise quantitative risk assessment matrix as the evaluation criteria and assesses the scores based on adjustment of CMI can make the assessment result scientific, reasonable, and clinically practical, further enhance the decision-making of risk management, and improve the hospital management level.

     

/

返回文章
返回