肝移植术后腹腔感染的危险因素及围术期肠道微生态干预效果

Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after liver transplantationand effect of perioperative intestinal microecological intervention

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨肝移植术后腹腔感染的危险因素,并分析围术期肠道微生态干预的预防效果。
    方法 纳入2020年1月-2025年6月于空军军医大学第一附属医院肝胆外科移植中心接受肝移植治疗的患者196例为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组,各98例。干预组围术期接受肠道微生态干预,对照组围术期接受常规治疗,比较两组肝移植术前1 d、术后第15天肠道菌群结构、炎症反应和氧化应激情况,观察两组术后肠道细菌移位和腹腔感染情况。根据术后腹腔感染情况分为感染组(n=37)和未感染组(n=159),采用logistic回归分析肝移植患者术后腹腔感染的危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估预测价值。
    结果 术后第15天,干预组肠道大肠埃希菌、粪肠球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌计数均低于对照组(P<0.05),干预组柔嫩梭菌、双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌计数均高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第15天,干预组C-反应蛋白、肿瘤坏死因子-α、丙二醛、血清过氧化脂质水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组细菌移位发生率12.24%(12/98)低于对照组细菌移位发生率23.47%(23/98)(P<0.05);干预组细菌移位及腹腔感染发生率8.16%(8/98)低于对照组29.59%(29/98)(P<0.05)。术前终末期肝病模型评分(≥20分)(OR=2.331)、腹腔积液(OR=3.358)是肝移植患者术后腹腔感染的危险因素(P<0.05),肠道微生态干预(OR=0.219)、预后营养指数高(OR=0.927)是肝移植患者术后腹腔感染的保护因素(P<0.05)。上述指标联合检测的曲线下面积为0.826,灵敏度为0.649,特异度为0.855。
    结论 肝移植术后的肠道微生态干预可改善术后肠道菌群失衡,能在一定程度上减轻炎症和氧化应激反应,减少肠道细菌移位的发生和腹腔感染的发生率。针对危险因素可采取干预措施以降低感染风险。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE  To investigate the risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after liver transplantation and analyze the preventive effect of perioperative intestinal microecological intervention.
    METHODS  A total of 196 patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from Jan. 2020 to Jun. 2025 were included in this study. They were divided into an intervention group and a control group based on a random number table, with 98 cases in each group. The intervention group received intestinal microecological intervention during the perioperative period, while the control group received conventional treatment. The intestinal flora structure, inflammatory response and oxidative stress were analyzed and compared between the two groups one day before liver transplantation and on the 15th day after surgery. The incidence of postoperative intestinal bacterial translocation and intra-abdominal infection in the two groups was observed. Meanwhile, the patients were divided into an infected group (n=37) and a non-infected group (n=159) according to their postoperative intra-abdominal infection status. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after liver transplantation, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive value.
    RESULTS  On the 15th day after surgery, the counts of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus in the intestinal tract of the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the counts of Clostridium leptum, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). On the 15th day after surgery, the levels of C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, malondialdehyde and serum lipid peroxides in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of bacterial translocation in the intervention group was 12.24% (12/98), which was lower than 23.47% (23/98) in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of bacterial translocation and intra-abdominal infection in the intervention group was 8.16% (8/98), which was lower than 29.59% (29/98) in the control group at (P<0.05). A preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (≥20 points) (OR=2.331) and ascites (OR=3.358) were risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after liver transplantation (P<0.05), while intestinal microecological intervention (OR=0.219) and a high prognostic nutritional index (OR=0.927) were protective factors against intra-abdominal infection after liver transplantation (P<0.05). The area under the curve for combined detection of the above markes was 0.826, with a sensitivity of 0.649 and a specificity of 0.855.
    CONCLUSIONS  Intestinal microecological intervention after liver transplantation can improve postoperative intestinal flora imbalance, alleviate inflammation and oxidative stress responses to a certain extent, reduce the incidence of intestinal bacterial translocation and intra-abdominal infection. The intervention measures can be implemented based on risk factors to reduce the risk of infection.

     

/

返回文章
返回