血清HMGB-1和MCP-1对慢性肾小球肾炎严重程度诊断及不良预后的预测价值

Predictive value of serum HMGB-1 and MCP-1 in diagnosing severity and poor prognosis of chronic glomerulonephritis

  • 摘要: 目的 探究高迁移率族蛋白B1(HMGB-1)、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)与慢性肾小球肾炎(CGN)严重程度及预后关系。方法 随机选取2022年2月-2023年2月西安中医肾病医院CGN患者100例,分为慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)1~2期(n=64)和CKD 3~5期(n=36),再分为预后良好组(n=68)和不良组(n=32)。分析HMGB-1、MCP-1对严重程度的诊断效能及对不良预后的预测价值。结果 CKD 3~5期较CKD 1~2期HMGB-1、MCP-1、β2微球蛋白(β2-MG)、胱抑素C(Cys-C)、血肌酐(Scr)、白细胞(WBC)、中性粒细胞(NEU)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)、IL-8增加(P<0.05),估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、IL-10降低(P<0.05)。随着CKD分期的增加,HMGB-1、MCP-1、HMGB-1联合MCP-1对其的诊断效能均呈增加趋势,且HMGB-1联合MCP-1诊断效能最高。模型2(包含HMGB-1和MCP-1)较模型1(不含HMGB-1和MCP-1) AUC、IDI、NRI提高,拟合优度更优(P<0.05)。HMGB-1和MCP-1升高增强CGN严重程度和不良预后的正关联且二者与预后不良存在非线性剂量-反应关系(P<0.001)。结论 血清HMGB-1、MCP-1随CGN患者CKD分期升高而升高,纳入二者的模型可提升病情预测价值,且二者与不良预后呈非线性剂量-反应关系,可作为诊断疾病严重程度及预测不良预后的有效指标。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between high mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and the severity and prognosis of chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). METHODS A total of 100 patients with CGN from Xi'an Kidney Diseases Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from Feb. 2022 to Feb. 2023 were randomly selected. They were divided into chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-2 (n=64) and CKD stages 3-5 (n=36). These groups were further divided into a favorable prognosis group (n=68) and a poor prognosis group (n=32). The diagnostic efficacy of HMGB-1 and MCP-1 for severity and their predictive value for poor prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS Compared with CKD stages 1-2, levels of HMGB-1, MCP-1, β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), cystatin C (Cys-C), serum creatinine (Scr), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils (NEU), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and IL-8 were increased in CKD stages 3-5 (P<0.05), while estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and IL-10 were decreased (P<0.05). As CKD stages advanced, the diagnostic efficacy of HMGB-1, MCP-1 and their combination for severity increased, with the combination of HMGB-1 and MCP-1 demonstrating the highest diagnostic efficacy. Model 2 (including HMGB-1 and MCP-1) showed improved AUC, IDI and NRI, as well as better goodness-of-fit than Model 1 (excluding HMGB-1 and MCP-1) (P<0.05). Elevated levels of HMGB-1 and MCP-1 enhanced the positive association between CGN severity and poor prognosis, and there was a nonlinear dose-response relationship between these markers and poor prognosis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Serum HMGB-1 and MCP-1 levels increase with the progression of CKD stages in patients with CGN. The inclusion of these two markers in a model can enhance the predictive value for disease prognosis. Moreover, both exhibit a nonlinear dose-response relationship with poor prognosis, serving as effective markers for diagnosing disease severity and predicting poor prognosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回