海分枝杆菌感染临床特征和诊断与治疗的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of Mycobacterium marinum infection

  • 摘要:
    目的 系统评价全球范围内海分枝杆菌感染的临床特征、诊断方法效能及治疗方案疗效,为临床诊治提供循证依据。
    方法 通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网(CNKI)、万方等数据库,纳入2000年5月-2024年12月发表的海分枝杆菌感染相关临床研究,采用Stata 17.0软件进行Meta分析,分析海分枝杆菌感染的临床特征、诊断方法效能及不同治疗方案的疗效与安全性。
    结果 本研究纳入42项研究,共包含1 896例患者,结果显示海分枝杆菌感染好发于中青年人群(加权均数年龄38.60岁),皮肤软组织感染为主要类型(82.30%),76.48%的患者有明确水接触史。在诊断方法中,核酸检测的敏感性(89.73%)高于传统培养(72.16%),适合快速诊断;治疗方面,治愈率:利福平联合乙胺丁醇方案与克拉霉素联合方案的治愈率差异无统计学意义(OR=1.150,95%CI:0.870~1.520,P=0.320),但两者均高于单药治疗(P均<0.05)。不良反应发生率:利福平联合乙胺丁醇方案的合并不良反应发生率为9.30%(95%CI:6.50%~12.10%),克拉霉素联合方案为15.60%(95%CI:12.30%~18.90%),单药治疗为8.70%(95%CI:5.30%~12.10%);以“利福平联合乙胺丁醇方案治愈率”为例绘制漏斗图,结果显示漏斗图基本对称,Egger检验提示P=0.250,表明无明显发表偏倚。
    结论 水接触史是海分枝杆菌感染的重要线索,核酸检测可提高诊断效率,利福平联合乙胺丁醇可作为首选治疗方案之一。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the clinical characteristics, diagnostic method accuracy and treatment regimen efficacy of Mycobacterium marinum infection worldwide, thereby providing evidence-based references for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
    METHODS Clinical studies related to M. marinum infection, published between May 2000 and Dec. 2024, were identified by searching databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software to assess the clinical characteristics, diagnostic method accuracy and the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens for M. marinum infection.
    RESULTS A total of 42 studies (1 896 patients) were included in this study. The results showed that M. marinum infection predominantly occurred in young and middle-aged individuals (weighted mean age: 38.60 years), with skin and soft tissue infections being the primary type (82.30%) and 76.48% of patients having a definite history of water exposure. For diagnostic methods, nucleic acid testing demonstrated higher sensitivity (89.73%) than traditional culture (72.16%), making it suitable for rapid diagnosis. For treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed in cure rates between the rifampicin-plus-ethambutol regimen and the clarithromycin-containing regimen (OR=1.150, 95%CI: 0.870−1.520, P=0.320). However, both were superior to monotherapy (both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 9.30% (95%CI: 6.50%−12.10%) for the rifampicin-plus-ethambutol regimen, 15.60% (95%CI: 12.30%−18.90%) for the clarithromycin-containing regimen and 8.70% (95%CI: 5.30%−12.10%) for monotherapy. A funnel plot was drawn according to the "cure rate of rifampicin-plus-ethambutol regimen", showing that the funnel plot was basically symmetrical. Egger's test indicated P=0.250, suggesting no significant publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS A history of water exposure is an important clue for M. marinum infection. Nucleic acid testing can improve diagnostic accuracy, and rifampicin-plus-ethambutol regimen can be considered as one of the preferred treatment options.

     

/

返回文章
返回