血培养阳性标本药敏方法学对比分析及评价

Comparative analysis and evaluation of methodologies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in blood culture-positive specimens

  • 摘要:
    目的 在准确鉴定的基础上,通过传统法、直接法和菌膜法三种方法对血培养阳性标本药敏试验的准确性进行对比研究,探讨不同处理方式对血流感染患者的治疗的价值,从而为临床合理使用抗菌药物提供依据。
    方法 随机选取青岛市市立医院本部院区2025年1-6月55例血培养报阳标本,采用传统法、直接法和菌膜法进行药敏试验,将直接法和菌膜法与传统法进行药敏试验比对分析,比对三种方法药敏试验结果的一致性。此外,分别收集99例和73例血培养报阳标本患者的基本信息作为传统法和菌膜法数据,比较流程优化前(传统法)后(菌膜法)患者的住院时间,转归及预后情况。
    结果 在药敏方面,与传统法相比,革兰阳性菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌总分类一致性(CA)%菌膜法为98.33%,直接法为91.67%;肠球菌总CA%菌膜法为100.00%,而直接法为97.14%;凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌总CA%菌膜法为100.00%,而直接法为95.00%。革兰阴性菌肠杆菌中,肺炎克雷伯菌总CA%菌膜法为98.69%,直接法为96.73%;大肠埃希菌总CA%菌膜法为95.61%,直接法为97.37%。其他肠杆菌总CA%菌膜法为98.96%,直接法为94.79%。革兰阴性菌非发酵菌中,铜绿假单胞菌总CA%菌膜法为98.03%,而直接法为96.15%;鲍曼不动杆菌总CA%菌膜法为95.79%,直接法为97.89%。在临床及预后方面,与传统法相比,ICU患者菌膜法平均年龄更大、但平均住院天数降低,存活率更高(P<0.001)。
    结论 与传统法相比,直接法和菌膜法进行药物敏感试验具有较高的分类一致性和较低的误差率,且利用菌膜法对阳性患者药敏进行测定,可降低患者住院天数,提高患者生存率。

     

    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE  Based on accurate identification, this study conducted a comparative study on the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for blood culture-positive specimens through three methods: the traditional method, the direct method and the bacterial film method. This aims to explore the value of different treatment approaches for management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI), thereby providing a basis for the rational clinical use of antimicrobial agents.
    METHODS  We randomly collected a total of 55 blood culture-positive specimens at the main campus of Qingdao Municipal Hospital from Jan. 2025 to Jun. 2025. Drug susceptibility testing was performed through the traditional method, the direct method and the bacterial film method to assess the consistency of the results among the three methods. Additionally, basic information from 99 and 73 patients with blood culture-positive specimens was collected separately as data for the traditional method and the biofilm method, comparing the length of hospital stay, outcomes and prognosis between the pre-optimization traditional method and post-optimization bacterial form method.
    RESULTS  In terms of drug susceptibility, compared to the traditional method, for gram-positive bacteria, the overall categorical agreement (CA%) for Staphylococcus aureus was 98.33% with the bacterial film method and 91.67% with the direct method. For Enterococcus, it was 100.00% with the bacterial film method and 97.14% with the direct method. For coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, it was 100.00% with the bacterial film method and 95.00% with the direct method. For gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae, the overall CA% for Klebsiella pneumoniae was 98.69% with the bacterial film method and 96.73% with the direct method. For Escherichia coli, it was 95.61% with the bacterial film method and 97.37% with the direct method. For other Enterobacteriaceae, it was 98.96% with the bacterial film method and 94.79% with the direct method. For gram-negative non-fermentative bacteria, the overall CA% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 98.03% with the bacterial film method and 96.15% with the direct method. For Acinetobacter baumannii, it was 95.79% with the bacterial film method and 97.89% with the direct method. In terms of clinical outcomes and prognosis, compared to the traditional method, patients in intensive care units (ICU) treated with the bacterial film method were old on average, but had a short average length of hospital stay and a high survival rate (P<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS  Compared with the traditional method, the direct method and bacterial film method for drug susceptibility testing exhibits high classification consistency and low error rates. Moreover, utilizing the bacterial film method to determine drug susceptibility in positive patients can reduce the length of hospital stay and improve patient survival rates.

     

/

返回文章
返回