不同类型病毒感染所致脓毒性休克患者炎症因子水平差异及常规治疗疗效对比

Differences in levels of inflammatory factors among patients with septic shock induced by various types of viral infections and comparative study on effects of conventional therapies

  • 摘要: 目的 对比不同病毒感染所致脓毒性休克炎症因子表达差异,明确病毒类型与炎症反应的关系,为精准干预提供依据。方法 选取2021年1月-2025年6月中国医科大学附属盛京医院和廊坊市人民医院重症监护室(ICU)收治的156例单一病毒感染所致早期脓毒性休克患者为研究对象,按病毒类型分为流感病毒组38例、腺病毒组45例、巨细胞病毒组35例和EB病毒组38例。收集患者入院24 h内治疗前和治疗后白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、IL-1β、C-反应蛋白(CRP)及降钙素原(PCT)水平,比较治疗有效率及28 d生存率。结果 四组基线资料比较无统计学差异。治疗前,腺病毒组IL-6、TNF-α、IL-1β水平最高(196.53±57.69、105.39±32.77、76.69±22.97)pg/ml,巨细胞病毒组最低(116.19±38.17、73.59±23.19、47.13±14.11)pg/ml,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001); CRP、PCT无统计学差异。治疗后,各组IL-6、TNF-α、IL-1β和CRP水平下降(P<0.05),PCT无变化; 腺病毒组炎症因子仍最高,巨细胞病毒组最低。四组治疗有效率(60.5%~74.3%)及28 d生存率比较,均无统计学差异。结论 不同病毒感染所致脓毒性休克患者炎症因子水平存在显著差异,腺病毒感染引发的炎症反应最强,巨细胞病毒感染最弱; 常规治疗可有效降低各组患者炎症反应,且对不同病毒感染患者的临床疗效无显著差异。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare the differences in expression levels of inflammatory factors among the patients with septic shock induced by virous viral infections and understand the association between the type of virus and the inflammatory response so as to provide bases for precise intervention. METHODS Totally 156 patients who had early stage of septic shock that was caused by single viral infection and were treated in intensive care unit (ICU) of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University and the People's Hospital Of Langfang City from Jan. 2021 to Jun. 2025 were recruited as the research subjects and were divided into the influenza virus group with 38 cases, the adenovirus group with 45 cases, the cytomegalovirus group with 35 cases, and the EB virus group with 38 cases according to the types of viruses. The levels of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-1β, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were observed and compared among the groups within 24 hours of the admission before the treatment and after the treatment. The effective rate of treatment and 28-day survival rate were compared. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the baseline data among the four groups. Before the treatment, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β of the adenovirus group were highest(196.53±57.69, 105.39±32.77, 76.69±22.97)pg/ml, the cytomegalovirus group the lowest(116.19±38.17, 73.59±23.19, 47.13±14.11)pg/ml,and there were between-group differences (P<0.001); there were no significant differences in the CRP and PCT. The levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β and CRP of the four groups declined after the treatment (P<0.05), while the PCT level did not change; the levels of inflammatory factors of the adenovirus group remained highest, the cytomegalovirus group the lowest. There were no significant differences in the effective rate of treatment (60.5%-74.3%) and 28-day survival rate among the four groups. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences in the levels of inflammatory factors among the patients with septic shock induced by virous viral infections, the adenovirus infection leads to the strongest inflammatory response, and the cytomegalovirus infection leads to the weakest inflammatory response. The conventional therapies can effectively reduce the inflammatory reactions of the patients and do not show any significant difference in the clinical therapeutic effect among the patients with various viral infections.

     

/

返回文章
返回