我国区域化消毒供应资源共享中心建设现状调查及分析

Investigation of current status of construction of regional sterile supplyresources sharing centers in China

  • 摘要: 目的 探索我国区域化消毒供应资源共享中心的建设现状与现存问题,为相关政策优化提供实证依据。方法 2025年5-6月对全国22个省(区、市)及新疆生产建设兵团的1 764家医疗机构消毒供应中心(室)的区域消毒供应资源共享情况开展问卷调查。结果 1 764家医疗机构中,41.16%开展消毒供应资源共享服务,服务方以二、三级医院为主,委托方以一、二级医院为主; 服务方中有96.22%受行政因素驱动,委托方中有67.21%因自身条件受限选择服务,双方驱动因素类型分布差异具有统计学意义(χ2=285.440,P<0.001); 三级医院服务外部医院数量(U=3 288.500,P<0.001)、服务器械包数量(U=4 476.500,P<0.001)均高于二级医院; 76.92%的服务方的最小服务半径在10公里内,73.95%的物流运输责任由委托方承担; 合同签订率94.36%,但定价机制不统一,66.67%的服务方以包型大小定价。结论 当前,我国区域化消毒供应资源共享中心建设存在对行政推动依赖度高、二级医院区域辐射能力未充分发挥、服务半径规划不够科学、合同与定价机制不完善等问题。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To explore the current status of construction of regional sterile supply resources sharing centers in China and find out the existing problems so as to provide solid evidence for optimization of related policies. METHODS From May 2025 to June 2025, a questionnaire survey was conducted for the current status of construction of regional sterile supply resources sharing centers in 1764 medical institutions across 22 provinces (autonomous regions, cities) and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps of China. RESULTS Among the 1764 medical institutions, 41.16% carried out the sharing service of sterile supply resources, the service providers were predominantly secondary and tertiary hospitals, while the clients were mainly primary and secondary hospitals. 96.22% of the service providers were driven by administrative factors, 67.21% of the clients chose the service due to the limitation of their own conditions, and there was significant difference in the distribution of types of driving factors between the service providers and the clients(χ2=285.440,P<0.001). The number of served external hospitals (U=3288.500,P<0.001) and the number of served instrument packages (U=4476.500,P<0.001) were larger in the tertiary hospitals than in the secondary hospitals. The minimum service radius of 76.92% of the service providers was within 10 kilometers, and 73.95% of logistics and transportation responsibilities were borne by the clients. The contract signing rate was 94.36%, but the pricing mechanisms were different, and 66.67% of the service provides fixed the price based on the size of package. CONCLUSION At present, there are problems such as high dependency on administrative promotion, failed release of the full regional radiation capabilities of secondary hospitals, unreasonable planning of service radius and incomplete contract and pricing mechanisms in the construction of regional sterile supply resources sharing centers in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回