上海市医院区域化消毒供应服务现状调查

Survey of current status of regionalized sterilization and supply service in hospitals of Shanghai

  • 摘要: 目的 了解上海市医院区域化消毒供应服务的现状,为持续改进消毒供应工作提供依据。方法 采用目的抽样法,于2025年11月选取上海市开展消毒供应服务委托或受托管理模式的医院进行问卷调查,并对结果进行统计描述。结果 在33所委托医院中,17所(51.52%)的常规器械处理周期超过12 h。二、三级医院院内应急供应中心设置率为91.67%(22/24),高于社区卫生服务中心和社会办医33.33%(3/9)(率差=58.34%,95%CI:24.63%~82.14%,P=0.001)。10所(41.67%)二级、三级委托医院自行处理精密手术器械。委托医院在回收环节的规范流程执行率为39.39%~72.73%。12所(36.36%)委托医院每日进行质量抽查,其中三级医院占69.23%,二级医院占18.18%,社区卫生服务中心和社会办医占11.11%。受托医院中,保供能力年处理器械包数量10~20万包的医院包括81.82%(9/11)的三级医院和66.67%(6/9)的二级医院,组间比较差异无统计学意义(率差=15.15%,95%CI:-23.17%~53.47%,P=0.617)。结论 区域化消毒供应服务在应急保障、精密手术器械处理、安全转运及质量控制等环节仍存在一些共性问题。应完善管理制度,加强人员培训,对于应急手术器械需求量较大的医院,建议优先自建消毒供应中心,以确保手术器械再处理的及时性与安全性。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To understand the current status of regionalized sterilization and supply services in hospitals of Shanghai so as to provide bases for continuous improvement of sterilization and supply service. METHODS By means of purposive sampling, a questionnaire survey was conducted for the hospitals where the entrusting or contracted management mode for sterilization and supply services was adopted in Nov. 2025 and the results were statistically described. RESULTS Among the 33 entrusting hospitals, 17 (51.52%) reported that the processing cycle of routine instruments exceeded 12 hours. The establishment rate of on-site emergency supply centers was 91.67% (22/24) in secondary and tertiary hospitals, significantly higher than 33.33% (3/9) in community health service centers and private medical institutions (rate difference = 58.34%, 95%CI: 24.63% to 82.14%, P= 0.001). 10 (41.67%) entrusting secondary and tertiary hospitals processed delicate surgical instruments independently. The rates of compliance with standardized procedures during the recycle phase ranged from 39.39% to 72.73% in the entrusting hospitals. 12 (36.36%) entrusting hospitals conducted daily quality spot checks, 69.23% of which were tertiary hospitals, 18.18% were secondary hospitals, and 11.11% were community health service centers and private hospitals. Among the entrusting hospitals with an annual supply capacity of 100 000 to 200 000 instrument packages, the tertiary hospitals accounted for 81.82%(9/11), and the secondary hospitals accounted for 66.67%(6/9), and there was no between-group difference (rate difference: =15.15%,95%CI:-23.17% to 53.47%,P=0.617). CONCLUSIONS The regional centralized sterilization and supply services still face common challenges in emergency support, processing of delicate surgical instruments, safe transportation, and quality control. It is necessary to improve the management systems and strengthen personnel training. For hospitals with high demand for emergency surgical instruments, the priority should be given to establishing in-house sterilization and supply centers so as to ensure the timeliness and safety of surgical instrument reprocessing.

     

/

返回文章
返回