2020-2025年某市61所医院住院患者重点多重耐药菌医院感染与社区感染流行特征及耐药性分析

Epidemiological characteristics of health care-associated infections and community-acquired infection caused by major multidrug-resistant organisms among hospitalized patients in 61 hospitals and drug resistance from 2020 to 2025

  • 摘要: 目的 分析医疗机构住院患者重点监测多重耐药菌(MDRO)医院感染与社区感染特征,为临床治疗和感染防控提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月-2025年12月苏州市61所医院9 611 683例住院患者的临床资料,根据感染来源分为医院感染组(HAI)和社区感染组(CAI),分析两组患者MDRO感染部位、病原菌构成和耐药谱。结果 MDRO在HAI组和CAI组的总体感染例次发病率分别为0.132%和0.167%。两组检出菌主要为耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)、耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP),且在HAI组检出率均高于CAI组(P<0.05)。两组下呼吸道感染均以CRKP、CRPA、CRAB和MRSA为主,尿路感染均以耐碳青霉烯类大肠埃希菌(CREC)、耐万古霉素粪肠球菌(VREfa)和耐万古霉素屎肠球菌(VREfm)为主。所有菌株在HAI组血流感染和手术部位感染占比较高,CAI组皮肤软组织MRSA感染、腹部和消化系统VREfa与VREfm感染占比较高。所有菌株多以ICU、神经外科和急诊科检出较多。CRKP、CREC、CRAB和VRE耐药严重,CRPA和MRSA对多数抗菌药物较为敏感。结论 MDRO感染在HAI和CAI组流行特征存在一定差异。应协调各部门提高抗微生物药物应用水平,开展重点人群、重点科室和相应病原菌的监测指导主动筛查、合理用药等感染防控措施。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To investigate the characteristics of health care-associated infections (HAIs) and community-acquired infections (CAIs) caused by major multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the hospitalized patients of medical institutions so as to provide reference for clinical treatment, prevention and control of the infections. METHODS The clinical data were collected from 9 611 683 patients who were hospitalized in 61 hospitals of Suzhou from Jan. 2020 to Dec. 2025 and were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were divided into the HAI group and the CAI group according to the source of infections. The sites of MDROs infections, species of pathogens and drug resistance spectrum were observed and compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS The overall case-time incidence rate of MDROs infection was 0.132% in the HAI group, 0.167% in the CAI group. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) were dominant among the pathogens isolated from the two groups of patients; the isolation rates of the above pathogens were higher in the HAI group than in the CAI group(P<0.05). In the two groups, the lower respiratory tract infections were mainly caused by CRKP, CRPA, CRAB and MRSA; carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VREfa) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium(VREfm) were dominant among the pathogens causing the urinary tract infections. The proportions of all the pathogens causing bloodstream infections and surgical site infections were high in the HAI group; the proportions of the patients who had skin and soft tissue infections with MRSA and the patients who had abdominal and digestive system infections with VREfa and VREfm were high in the CAI group. Most of the strains were isolated from ICU, neurosurgery department and emergency department. The CRKP, CREC, CRAB and VRE were highly drug-resistant, while the CRPA and MRSA strains were highly sensitive to most of the antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS There are certain differences in the epidemiological characteristics of the MDROs infection between the HAI group and the CAI group. It is necessary to coordinate the department to boost the reasonable use of antimicrobial drugs, carry out the active screening of key populations and departments as well as surveillance of related pathogens, and reasonably use antibiotics.

     

/

返回文章
返回