超微经皮肾镜和输尿管软镜在治疗肾结石中的感染控制及疗效的对比研究

Contrastive study on the infection control and curative effect of ultrasonography percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculus

  • 摘要: 目的 分析超微经皮肾镜和输尿管软镜在治疗肾结石中的感染控制及疗效。方法 选取2015年5月-2016年5月医院诊治的肾结石患者140例为研究对象,入选者自主选择疗法,超微经皮肾镜碎石术(UPCNL)组70例患者,输尿管软镜碎石术(URSL)组70例患者,分别观察两组患者术后肾功能、临床指标及术后不良反应。结果 UPCNL组患者在体内清石效果中的显效率及无效率分别为64.29%及5.71%,均优于URSL组患者50.00%及21.43%,两组患者疗效对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);UPCNL组患者在结石直径≤20 mm的临床指标中,手术时间、术中出血量与清石率均优于URSL组患者,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);而在结石直径>20 mm的临床指标中,手术时间、术中出血量均显著增加,尤其术中出血量对比仍有明显差异(P<0.01);治疗后,UPCNL组患者血红蛋白水平为(106.2±9.8) g·l-1, 下降幅度较小,明显高于URSL组患者的(98.4±9.5) g·l-1,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组患者血肌酐水平术前术后对比,无明显差异,说明两种疗法对患者的肾功能几乎无影响。结论 采用超微经皮肾镜术和输尿管软镜术在治疗肾结石患者中,对不同结石大小患者的疗效有所区别,但整体上超微经皮肾镜术,术后结石并发症率低,疗效突出。

     

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE To analyze the infection control and curative effect of ultrasonography percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal calculus. METHODS A total of 140 patients with renal calculus who were diagnosed and treated in our department from May 2015 to May 2016 were enrolled in the study. The patients selected the treatment method by themselves, and 70 patients in UPCNL group and 70 patients in URSL group. Postoperative renal function, clinical parameters and postoperative adverse reactions were observed in the two groups. RESULTS The effective rate and ineffective rate of the cleaning effect in the body of UPCNL group were 64.29% and 5.71%, which were significantly better than 50.00% and 21.43% of URSL group (P<0.05). The clinical indexes of patients in UPCNL group with the stone diameter less than 20 mm were better than those of patients in URSL group, including the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and stone clearance rate (P<0.01). In patients with the stone diameter larger than 20 mm, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly increased, especially the amount of intraoperative blood loss was still significantly different (P<0.01). After treatment, the hemoglobin level of UPCNL group was (106.2 ± 9.8) g·l-1, which was significantly higer than (98.4 ± 9.5) g·l-1 of URSL group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in serum creatinine level between the two groups before and after operation, which indicated that the two treatments had no effect on renal function. CONCLUSION Using ultrasonography percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of patients with renal calculus, the effects of patients with different sizes of stones are different, but on the whole using ultrasonography percutaneous nephrolithotomy has low postoperative complications of calculus, and has outstanding efficacy.

     

/

返回文章
返回